2021-11-04T14:48:58-05:00 2021-06-30 581304721 LANIGAN & ASSOCIATES P C 314 GORDON AVENUE THOMASVILLE GA 31792 990 2020-07-01 581247027 SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION INC SOUT 7709772131 560 W CROSSVILLE ROAD SUITE 104 ROSWELL GA 300757509 TODD YOUNG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 7709772131 2021-11-03 0 TODD YOUNG 999009999 DAVID STRANGE P01305761 2292268320 0 AAL1 IAL1 2020 2022-09-23 18:48:47Z TODD YOUNG 560 W CROSSVILLE ROAD SUITE 104 ROSWELL GA 300757509 2516804 0 X WWW.SLFLIBERTY.ORG X 1976 GA SEE SCHEDULE O FOR DETAILED EXPLANATION: 8 8 3 0 0 0 1747182 2239255 0 0 167625 169849 0 107700 1914807 2516804 0 0 0 0 413857 457865 93843 113483 124182 1435183 1568593 1942883 2139941 -28076 376863 7130675 8096210 137478 78381 6993197 8017829 AS A PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FIRM, THE ORGANIZATION'S PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOR PLAINTIFFS IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS IN CASES INVOLVING ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC INTEREST ON A NON-FEE BASIS. 0 0 1919682 IN ADDITION TO LEGAL SERVICES, THE ORGANIZATION ALSO CONDUCTS NONPARTISAN STUDIES AND RESEARCH AND COLLECTS, COMPILES AND PUBLISHES FULL AND FAIR PRESENTATIONS OF FACTS, INFORMATION, AND STATISTICS CONCERNING THE EFFECTS OF GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES UPON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. 1919682 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 AL AK AR AZ CA CO CT GA FL IL KS KY LA MD MA MI MN MO MS NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC TN TX VA WA WV WI X X X JOSALYN H SPIVEY 7709772131 560 W CROSSVILLE ROAD SUITE 104 ROSWELL GA 30075 X DENNY JONES TRUSTEE 5.00 X 0 0 0 RONNIE CHANCE CHAIRMAN 5.00 X X 0 0 0 JOE ARNALL SECRETARY 5.00 X X 0 0 0 KATHY BARCO-JOSSIM TRUSTEE 5.00 X 0 0 0 MICHAEL G RILEY TREASURER 5.00 X X 0 0 0 EMERSON RUSSELL TRUSTEE 5.00 X 0 0 0 E GAY MAYFIELD TRUSTEE 5.00 X X 0 0 0 AMY STARZYNSKI TRUSTEE 5.00 X 0 0 0 TODD YOUNG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 50.00 X 0 0 0 KIM HERMANN SENIOR COUNSEL 50.00 X 166000 0 8300 166000 0 8300 1 0 1 0 DECISIONMAKERS INC 250 WILLOW SPRINGS DRIVE ROSWELL GA 30075 CONSULTING 221000 FORTHRIGHT STRATEGY INC 1155 15TH STREET NW SUITE 410 WASHINGTON DC 20005 FRC 113480 DIAL STRATEGIC CONSULTING INC 1137 SENOIA ROAD SUITE A TYRONE GA 30290 CONSULTING 102056 3 2239255 2239255 169849 169849 PPP LOAN FORGIVENESS 900099 107700 107700 107700 2516804 0 0 277549 166000 166000 230327 151311 74368 4648 61538 48043 12701 794 304941 304941 113483 113483 7681 7681 9127 8215 456 456 11855 11855 DIRECT MAIL PROGRAM 1021343 1021343 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 125028 118777 5001 1250 OFFICE EXPENSE 21871 19683 1094 1094 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 15081 13573 754 754 51666 48260 1703 1703 2139941 1919682 96077 124182 820204 836434 8980 9542 320076 71836 250138 248240 5983715 6937416 67638 64578 7130675 8096210 8333 0 66699 66699 55900 0 6546 11682 137478 78381 X 6993197 8017829 6993197 8017829 7130675 8096210 376863 647769 0 X X 0 1 X 1 0 X 3376450 3174965 2337554 1747182 2239255 12875406 3376450 3174965 2337554 1747182 2239255 12875406 12875406 52653 87692 128666 167563 169849 606423 13481829 0.95500 0.89640 X RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 0 0 248551 17629 230922 71525 54207 17318 248240 ACCRUED EXPENSES 11682 11682 X 3164574 647770 647770 2516804 0 2516804 2139941 0 2139941 0 2139941 PART X, LINE 2: THE FOUNDATION ADOPTED THE RECOGNITION REQUIREMENT OF UNCERTAIN INCOME TAX POSITIONS AS REQUIRED BY GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES, WITH NO CUMULATIVE EFFECT ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED. INCOME TAX BENEFITS ARE RECOGNIZED FOR INCOME TAX POSITIONS TAKEN OR EXPECTED TO BE TAKEN IN A TAX RETURN, ONLY WHEN IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE INCOME TAX POSITIONS WILL MORE-LIKELY-THAN-NOT BE SUSTAINED UPON EXAMINATION BY TAXING AUTHORITIES. THE FOUNDATION HAS ANALYZED TAX POSITIONS TAKEN FOR FILING WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND OTHER TAXING AUTHORITIES. X X X X X 1 AL AK AR AZ CA CO CT FL GA IL KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MO MS NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC TN VA WA WV WI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KIM HERMANN SENIOR COUNSEL 166000 0 0 0 0 0 8300 0 0 0 174300 0 0 0 FORM 990, PART I, LINE 1, DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION MISSION: AS A PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FIRM, THE ORGANIZATION'S PRIMARY PURPOSE IS TO PROVIDE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOR PLAINTIFFS IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS IN CASES INVOLVING ISSUES OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC INTEREST ON A NON-FEE BASIS, AND TO MAKE GRANTS FOR SUCH PURPOSES; THE ORGANIZATION ALSO CONDUCTS NONPARTISAN STUDIES AND RESEARCH AND COLLECTS, COMPILES AND PUBLISHES FULL AND FAIR PRESENTATIONS OF FACTS, INFORMATION, AND STATISTICS CONCERNING THE EFFECTS OF GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES UPON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC. CASES, BRIEFS AND ISSUES OF INTEREST FY 2021: CARPENTER V. VILSACK, ET AL. (DISTRICT COURT OF WYOMING; CASE 21-CV-0103-F). SLF REPRESENTS LEISL CARPENTER IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE USDA CHALLENGING THE USDA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FARM LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM THAT EXCLUDES WHITE FARMERS AND RANCHERS BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. HOLMAN V. VILSACK, ET AL. (WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE; CASE 1:21-CV-01085-STA-JAY). SLF REPRESENTS ROBERT HOLMAN IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE USDA CHALLENGING THE USDA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL FARM LOAN FORGIVENESS PROGRAM THAT EXCLUDES WHITE FARMERS AND RANCHERS BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. DEEMAR V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON/SKOKIE, ET AL. (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS; CASE 1:21-CV-03466). SLF REPRESENTS STACY DEEMAR IN A LAWSUIT SEEKING TO STOP THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DISCRIMINATING AGAINST ALL OF ITS TEACHERS AND ALL OF ITS STUDENTS ON THE BASIS OF RACE THROUGH ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL TEACHER TRAINING, CLASSROOM CURRICULUM, AND OVERALL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. HENDERSON, ET AL. V. SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ET AL. (WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI; CASE 6:21-CV-03219). SLF REPRESENTS BROOKE HENDERSON AND JENNIFER LUMLEY IN A LAWSUIT SEEKING TO STOP THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM VIOLATING THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND REQUIRING AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT THAT ITS EDUCATORS COMMIT TO EQUITY, BECOME ANTI-RACIST EDUCATORS, AND AFFIRM DIVISIVE AND DISCRIMINATORY PROGRAMMING THAT PROMOTES TREATING INDIVIDUALS DIFFERENTLY BASED ON SKIN COLOR. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. TERKEL, ET AL. V. CDC, ET AL. (EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS; CASE 6:20-CV-564-JCB & FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS; CASE 21-40137). SLF REPRESENTS PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS CHALLENGING THE U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION'S NATIONWIDE EVICTION MORATORIUM. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. MCLEMORE, ET AL. V. TENNESSEE, ET AL. (MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE; CASE 3:19-CV-00530). SLF REPRESENTS BUSINESS OWNERS CHALLENGING TENNESSEE'S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR ONLINE AUCTIONS AS VIOLATING THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND COMMERCE CLAUSE. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. KNIGHT, ET AL. V. THE METROPOLITAN GOV'T OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY (MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE; CASE 3:20-CV-00922). SLF REPRESENTS PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS CHALLENGING NASHVILLE'S SIDEWALK ORDINANCE WHICH PLACES UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS ON THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. THIS MATTER IS PENDING. SOLOMON V. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; CASE 1:19-CV-02019-TNM). SLF REPRESENTS JOHN SOLOMON IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE IS PENDING. SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; CASE 1:19-CV-03215-JPB). SLF SUED THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE IS PENDING. SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; CASE 1:19-CV-03429-MHC). SLF SUED THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE HAS BEEN CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE 1:19-CV-3215-JPB). SOLOMON V. ST. LOUIS CIRCUIT ATTORNEY (ST. LOUIS CIRCUIT COURT; CASE 2022-CC80 AND MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS ED109396). SLF REPRESENTS JOHN SOLOMON IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE ST. LOUIS CIRCUIT ATTORNEYS' OFFICE ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF THE MISSOURI SUNSHINE ACT. WE OBTAINED A FAVORABLE RULING, BUT THE DEFENDANTS' APPEAL IS PENDING. SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION V. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; 1:19-CV-03144-JPB). SLF SUED THE ODNI FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE WAS RESOLVED IN FY21. SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; CASE 1:19-CV-03038-LNM). SLF SUED THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE WAS RESOLVED IN FY21. SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; CASE 19-CV-05567-JPB). SLF SUED THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE IS WAS RESOLVED IN FY21. SOLOMON V. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; CASE 1:20-CV-00132). SLF REPRESENTS JOHN SOLOMON IN AN ACTION AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. THIS CASE IS WAS RESOLVED IN FY21. WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES CHALLENGE (MULTIPLE CASES). SLF REPRESENTS A VARIETY OF COMPANIES AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS CHALLENGING THE NEW DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES" (WOTUS), PROMULGATED BY THE EPA AND ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, AS A VIOLATION OF BOTH THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. THE CASES ARE LISTED BELOW: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (U.S. SUPREME COURT; CASE NO.16-299) SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION ET AL. V. EPA ET AL. (COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT; CASE 15-3885) SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION ET AL. V. EPA ET AL. (NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; CASE 1:15-CV-02488) SLF WON A FAVORABLE RULING BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND ACCORDINGLY, THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CASE WAS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (IN SLF'S FAVOR). SLF CONTINUES TO LITIGATE IN THE DISTRICT COURT, FILE AMICUS BRIEFS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY IN RELATED ACTIONS, AND FILE PUBLIC COMMENTS WITH EPA AND ARMY CORPS REGARDING ADOPTION OF A NEW DEFINITION OF WOTUS. YOUNG V. GUNNISON COUNTY (PRE-LITIGATION). SLF REPRESENTED A PROPERTY OWNER SEEKING TO STOP UNCONSTITUTIONAL COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY AND COUNTY BOUNDARIES. THIS CASE WAS RESOLVED IN FY21. FLEMING V. THE FDRLST MEDIA (NLRB CASE 2-CA-243109 AND THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CASES 20-3434; 20-3492). SLF REPRESENTS EMPLOYEES AT THE FEDERALIST WHO ARE WITNESSES IN THE NLRB ACTION AGAINST THE FDRLST MEDIA. THE CASE IS PENDING BEFORE THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. CEDAR POINT V. HASSID. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SUPPORTING THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. FP DEVELOPMENT V. CANTON. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SUPPORTING THE PROPERTY OWNERS. SPEECH FIRST V. KILLEEN. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT SUPPORTING SPEECH FIRST. NAACP V. DEVOS. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF SUPPORTING SCHOOL CHOICE WITH THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. HOGGARD V. RHODES. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SUPPORTING FREE SPEECH. AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY V. BECERRA. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SUPPORTING AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY. FCC V. PROMETHEUS. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. NEW HAMPSHIRE V. MASSACHUSETTS. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SUPPORTING A CHALLENGE OF MASSACHUSETTS INCOME TAX LAW. GIBSON V. SEC. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SUPPORTING THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. BESHEAR V. GOODWIN. SLF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT SUPPORTING A CHALLENGE TO COVID-RESTRICTIONS. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE PROJECT. SLF CONTINUED ITS WORK ON A POLICY PROJECT TO ADDRESS CONCERNS WITH ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN THE NAME OF ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. THIS INCLUDES LEGAL RESEARCH, POLICY PAPERS, PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND POTENTIAL LITIGATION. 1A PROJECT. SLF CONTINUED ITS WORK ON ITS 1A PROJECT (FORMERLY THE STUDENT FREEDOM AND SAFETY PROJECT) TO PROVIDE LEGAL COUNSEL AND ADVOCACY ON BEHALF OF STUDENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES AND BEING DEPRIVED THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. SLF REPRESENTS STUDENTS ACROSS THE NATION. SLF TRAINED NEARLY 1,000 STUDENTS, ASSISTED STUDENTS AT 30 UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES WITH FREE SPEECH ISSUES, AND DISTRIBUTED OVER 1,500 GUIDEBOOKS TO STUDENTS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS. SLF HAS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUESTS PENDING WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, EPA'S OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, ON SEVERAL TOPICS OF INTEREST TO THE PUBLIC. VOTER PROTECTION PROJECT. DEVELOPMENT OF POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE BLUEPRINTS FOR STATES REGARDING ELECTIONEERING LAWS; POLICY PAPERS TO SUPPORT THE SAME, INCLUDING EXTENSIVE LEGAL RESEARCH ON SAME. FORM 990, PART III, LINE 4A AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANDATE PROJECT. DEVELOPMENT OF POLICY AND LEGAL ADVOCACY REGARDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANDATES IMPOSED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND RELATED REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; INCLUDING EXTENSIVE LEGAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC EDUCATION ON THE SAME. STOP SANCTUARY CITIES PROJECT. SLF LAUNCHED THIS PROJECT TO ADDRESS THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS CAUSED BY SANCTUARY JURISDICTIONS. SLF SUBMITTED OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES. SLF ALSO PROVIDED LEGAL OPINION TO ADMINISTRATIVE BOARDS ON THE LEGALITY OF POLICIES REGARDING SANCTUARY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11B ORGANIZATION'S PROCESS TO REVIEW FORM 990 WAS APPROVED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ALONG WITH THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PRIOR TO FILING. THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE COMPILES NECESSARY INFORMATION TO COMPLETE THE FORM 990 THAT IS PREPARED BY INDEPENDENT TAX PREPARERS. DRAFTS OF FORM 990 ARE REVIEWED BY THE FOUNDATION'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND EXEXCUTIVE COMMITTEE AND CORRECTIONS ARE MADE. THE COMPLETED 990 IS THEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BEFORE FILING, AND PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES PRIOR TO FILING. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C SLF'S BOARD MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES AND CONTRACTORS ARE COMMUNICATED WITH REGULARLY AND/OR ASKED TO COMMUNICATE IF AND WHEN ANTICIPATED CONFLICT ARISES. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15A AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MADE UP OF THE CHAIRMAN, SECRETARY AND TREASURER DELIBERATE, RESEARCH, AND COMPARE SIMILAR POSITION COMPENSATION LEVELS BEFORE APPROVING THE COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19 THE FOUNDATION PROVIDES COPIES OF ITS FORM 990 AND ANNUAL AUDIT ON ITS WEBSITE, ANOTHER'S WEBSITE AND UPON REQUEST.