STRATEGY STUDIO / NONPROFIT PEOPLE SEARCH

EARTHJUSTICE: Form 990, tax year 2009

View the entire original 990 at ProPublica ↗

Organization
EARTHJUSTICE (EIN 94-1730465)
Tax period
2009-07-01 to 2010-06-30
Filed
2011-02-07
IRS object ID
201130389349300748
Schema version
2009v1.7
Source
Download XML · Original 990 at ProPublica

Every field in the e-filed return. Faint text is the IRS element name, for citing.

Return header ReturnHeader

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Timestamp2011-02-07T16:37:27-06:00Timestamp
Tax Period End Date2010-06-30TaxPeriodEndDate

Preparer Firm PreparerFirm

Preparer Firm Business Name PreparerFirmBusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1MOSS ADAMS LLPBusinessNameLine1

Preparer Firm US Address PreparerFirmUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line13121 West March Lane Suite 100AddressLine1
CitySTOCKTONCity
StateCAState
ZIP Code95219ZIPCode
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return Type990ReturnType
Tax Period Begin Date2009-07-01TaxPeriodBeginDate

Filer Filer

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
EIN941730465EIN

Name Name

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1EARTHJUSTICEBusinessNameLine1
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Name ControlEARTNameControl
Phone5105506700Phone

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1426 17th street 6th floorAddressLine1
CityoaklandCity
StateCAState
ZIP Code946122820ZIPCode

Officer Officer

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
NameBRUCE M NEIGHBORName
TitleVP FinanceTitle
Phone5105506700Phone
Date Signed2011-02-04DateSigned
Authorize Third Party1AuthorizeThirdParty

Preparer Preparer

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Phone2099556100Phone
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Tax Year2009TaxYear
Build TS2016-02-24 21:20:13ZBuildTS

Form 990 IRS990

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Name Of Principal Officer Persondonnell van noppenNameOfPrincipalOfficerPerson

Address Principal Officer US AddressPrincipalOfficerUS

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1426 17th street 6th floorAddressLine1
CityoaklandCity
StateCAState
ZIP Code946122820ZIPCode
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Gross Receipts40444727GrossReceipts
Group Return For Affiliates0GroupReturnForAffiliates
Organization501cXOrganization501c
Web Sitewww.earthjustice.orgWebSite
Type Of Organization CorporationXTypeOfOrganizationCorporation
Year Formation1970YearFormation
State Legal DomicileCAStateLegalDomicile
Activity Or Mission DescriptionWe use the law to protect the natural heritage, safeguard health, and promote clean energy.ActivityOrMissionDescription
Nbr Voting Members Governing Body28NbrVotingMembersGoverningBody
Nbr Independent Voting Members28NbrIndependentVotingMembers
Total Nbr Employees221TotalNbrEmployees
Total Nbr Volunteers10TotalNbrVolunteers
Total Gross UBI0TotalGrossUBI
Net Unrelated Business Txbl Income0NetUnrelatedBusinessTxblIncome
Contributions Grants Prior Year25712988ContributionsGrantsPriorYear
Contributions Grants Current Year21101486ContributionsGrantsCurrentYear
Program Service Revenue Prior Year2308686ProgramServiceRevenuePriorYear
Program Service Revenue CY2894617ProgramServiceRevenueCY
Investment Income Prior Year-264785InvestmentIncomePriorYear
Investment Income Current Year-982856InvestmentIncomeCurrentYear
Other Revenue Prior Year84644OtherRevenuePriorYear
Other Revenue Current Year130173OtherRevenueCurrentYear
Total Revenue Prior Year27841533TotalRevenuePriorYear
Total Revenue Current Year23143420TotalRevenueCurrentYear
Grants And Similar Amnts Prior Year84600GrantsAndSimilarAmntsPriorYear
Grants And Similar Amnts CY89160GrantsAndSimilarAmntsCY
Benefits Paid To Members CY0BenefitsPaidToMembersCY
Salaries Etc Prior Year17042960SalariesEtcPriorYear
Salaries Etc Current Year16381462SalariesEtcCurrentYear
Total Prof Fundrsng Exp Prior Year586968TotalProfFundrsngExpPriorYear
Total Prof Fundrsng Exp CY595156TotalProfFundrsngExpCY
Total Fundrsng Exp Current Year3502201TotalFundrsngExpCurrentYear
Other Expense Prior Year9521477OtherExpensePriorYear
Other Expenses Current Year8714421OtherExpensesCurrentYear
Total Expenses Prior Year27236005TotalExpensesPriorYear
Total Expenses Current Year25780199TotalExpensesCurrentYear
Revenues Less Expenses Prior Year605528RevenuesLessExpensesPriorYear
Revenues Less Expenses CY-2636779RevenuesLessExpensesCY
Total Assets BOY38133876TotalAssetsBOY
Total Assets EOY39270926TotalAssetsEOY
Total Liabilities BOY6569433TotalLiabilitiesBOY
Total Liabilities EOY6893412TotalLiabilitiesEOY
Net Assets Or Fund Balances BOY31564443NetAssetsOrFundBalancesBOY
Net Assets Or Fund Balances EOY32377514NetAssetsOrFundBalancesEOY
Mission DescriptionEARTHJUSTICE IS A NON-PROFIT PUBLIC INTEREST LAW FIRM DEDICATED TO PROTECTING THE MAGNIFICENT PLACES, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND WILDLIFE OF THIS EARTH AND TO DEFENDING THE RIGHT OF ALL PEOPLE TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT. WE BRING ABOUT FAR-REACHING CHANGE BY ENFORCING AND STRENGTHENING ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS ON BEHALF OF HUNDREDS OF ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMUNITIES.MissionDescription
Significant New Program Services0SignificantNewProgramServices
Significant Change0SignificantChange
Expense14047408Expense
Grants89160Grants
Revenue2894617Revenue
DescriptionPROVIDE FREE LEGAL REPRESENTATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS OF A BROAD PUBLIC NATURE.Description

Activity2 Activity2

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Expense6112261Expense
DescriptionPROVIDE INCREASED PUBLIC, MEDIA AND POLICY MAKER AWARENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND THE ROLE OF LAW IN RESOLVING THEM.Description
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Expense20159669TotalProgramServiceExpense
Described In501 C31DescribedIn501C3
Schedule B Required1ScheduleBRequired
Political Activities0PoliticalActivities
Lobbying Activities1LobbyingActivities
Donor Advised Funds0DonorAdvisedFunds
Conservation Easements0ConservationEasements
Collections Of Art0CollectionsOfArt
Credit Counseling0CreditCounseling
Term Or Permanent Endowments1TermOrPermanentEndowments
Balance Sheet Amounts Reported1BalanceSheetAmountsReported
Independent Audit Financial Stmt1IndependentAuditFinancialStmt
Consolidated Audit Financial Stmt0ConsolidatedAuditFinancialStmt
School0School
Foreign Office1ForeignOffice
Foreign Activities1ForeignActivities
More Than5000 K To Organizations0MoreThan5000KToOrganizations
More Than5000 K To Individuals0MoreThan5000KToIndividuals
Professional Fundraising1ProfessionalFundraising
Fundraising Activities0FundraisingActivities
Gaming0Gaming
Hospital0Hospital
Grants To Organizations1GrantsToOrganizations
Grants To Individuals0GrantsToIndividuals
Schedule J Required1ScheduleJRequired
Tax Exempt Bonds0TaxExemptBonds
Excess Benefit Transaction0ExcessBenefitTransaction
Prior Excess Benefit Transaction0PriorExcessBenefitTransaction
Loan To Officer Or DQP0LoanToOfficerOrDQP
Grant To Related Person0GrantToRelatedPerson
Bsnss Rltnshp With Organization0BsnssRltnshpWithOrganization
Bsnss Rltnshp Thru Family Member0BsnssRltnshpThruFamilyMember
Officer Entity With Bsnss Rltnshp0OfficerEntityWithBsnssRltnshp
Deductible Non Cash Contributions1DeductibleNonCashContributions
Deductible Contributions Of Art0DeductibleContributionsOfArt
Terminated0Terminated
Partial Liquidation0PartialLiquidation
Disregarded Entity0DisregardedEntity
Related Entity0RelatedEntity
Related Org Controlled Entity0RelatedOrgControlledEntity
Transfers To Exempt Non Chrtbl Org0TransfersToExemptNonChrtblOrg
Activities Conducted Partnership0ActivitiesConductedPartnership
Schedule O Required1ScheduleORequired
Number Forms Transmitted With1096101NumberFormsTransmittedWith1096
Number W2 G Included0NumberW2GIncluded
Compliance With Backup Witholding1ComplianceWithBackupWitholding
Number Of Employees221NumberOfEmployees
Employment Tax Returns Filed1EmploymentTaxReturnsFiled
Unrelated Business Income0UnrelatedBusinessIncome
Foreign Financial Account0ForeignFinancialAccount
Prohibited Tax Shelter Trans0ProhibitedTaxShelterTrans
Taxable Party Notification0TaxablePartyNotification
Non Deductible Contributions0NonDeductibleContributions
Quid Pro Quo Contributions0QuidProQuoContributions
Form8282 Property Disposed Of0Form8282PropertyDisposedOf
Funds To Pay Premiums0FundsToPayPremiums
Premiums Paid0PremiumsPaid
Nbr Voting Governing Body Members28NbrVotingGoverningBodyMembers
Number Independent Voting Members28NumberIndependentVotingMembers
Family Or Business Relationship0FamilyOrBusinessRelationship
Delegation Of Management Duties0DelegationOfManagementDuties
Changes To Organizing Docs0ChangesToOrganizingDocs
Material Diversion Or Misuse0MaterialDiversionOrMisuse
Members Or Stockholders0MembersOrStockholders
Election Of Board Members0ElectionOfBoardMembers
Decisions Subject To Approval0DecisionsSubjectToApproval
Minutes Of Governing Body1MinutesOfGoverningBody
Minutes Of Committees1MinutesOfCommittees
Officer Mailing Address0OfficerMailingAddress
Local Chapters0LocalChapters
Form990 Provided To Governing Body0Form990ProvidedToGoverningBody
Conflict Of Interest Policy1ConflictOfInterestPolicy
Annual Disclosure Covered Persons1AnnualDisclosureCoveredPersons
Regular Monitoring Enforcement1RegularMonitoringEnforcement
Whistleblower Policy1WhistleblowerPolicy
Document Retention Policy1DocumentRetentionPolicy
Compensation Process CEO1CompensationProcessCEO
Compensation Process Other1CompensationProcessOther
Investment In Joint Venture0InvestmentInJointVenture
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledALStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledAKStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledAZStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledARStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledCAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledCTStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledFLStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledGAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledILStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledKSStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledKYStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledLAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMDStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMEStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMNStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMSStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledNHStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledNJStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledNMStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledNYStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledNCStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledOHStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledOKStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledORStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledPAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledRIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledSCStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledTNStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledUTStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledVAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledWAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledWVStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledWIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledHIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
States Where Copy Of Return Is FiledMOStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFiled
Own WebsiteXOwnWebsite
Upon RequestXUponRequest

The Books Are In Care Of TheBooksAreInCareOf

Name Business NameBusiness

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1BRUCE M NEIGHBOR VP FinanceBusinessNameLine1
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Telephone Number5105506700TelephoneNumber

Address US AddressUS

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1426 17TH STREET 6TH FLOORAddressLine1
CityOaklandCity
StateCAState
ZIP Code946122820ZIPCode

Form990 Part VII Section A Form990PartVIISectionA (42 entries)

TitleTitleAverage Hours Per WeekAverageHoursPerWeekIndividual Trustee Or DirectorIndividualTrusteeOrDirectorReportable Comp From OrganizationReportableCompFromOrganizationReportable Comp From Related OrgsReportableCompFromRelatedOrgsOther CompensationOtherCompensationOfficerOfficerHighest Compensated EmployeeHighestCompensatedEmployeeFormerFormer
Albert Andrews
Trustee1.00X000
Reginald Brack Jr
Trustee1.00X000
Susan Britton
Trustee1.00X000
Peter Carson
Trustee, Secretary1.00X000X
David Cox
Trustee, Treasurer1.00X000X
Russel Daggatt
Trustee1.00X000
Tony DeFalco
Trustee1.00X000
Susan Fisher
Trustee1.00X000
Louise Gund
Trustee1.00X000
Barbara Haas
Trustee1.00X000
M Chris Killingsworth
Trustee1.00X000
Ed Lewis
Trustee, Chair1.00X000X
Lisa Litvin
Trustee1.00X000
George Martin
Trustee1.00X000
Michael McIntosh
Trustee1.00X000
Fred Meyer
Trustee1.00X000
Dan Olincy
Trustee1.00X000
Brad Parker
Trustee1.00X000
Bill Pope
Trustee1.00X000
Lisa Renstrom
Trustee1.00X000
Marcia Riklis
Trustee1.00X000
Betty Schafer
Trustee1.00X000
Theodore M Smith
Trustee1.00X000
Dianne Stern
Trustee1.00X000
Liz Sutherland
Trustee1.00X000
Kevin Toner
Trustee1.00X000
Stephen Unfried
Trustee1.00X000
G Marc Whitehead
Trustee1.00X000
DONNELL VAN NOPPEN
President40.00281604043583X
MELINDA CARMACK
Vice President40.00169285036597X
MARTIN HAYDEN
Vice President40.00154455038162X
WILLIAM CURTISS
Deputy Director40.00154442039165X
BARBARA DRAGO
Vice President40.00148372026505X
BRUCE NEIGHBOR
Vice President40.00142246037378X
PATTI GOLDMAN
Vice President40.00181756042265X
GEORGIA MCINTOSH
VP Communications40.00143086037431X
DAVID BARON
Managing Attorney40.00137232030691X
TODD TRUE
Managing Attorney40.00138555027023X
DAVID GUEST
Managing Attorney40.00137100017972X
TRENT ORR
Managing Attorney40.0013537807788X
PAUL ACHITOFF
Managing Attorney40.00135924024858X
VAWTER PARKER
STRATEG ADVIS/FORMER ED24.00131149032559X
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Reportable Comp From Org2190584TotalReportableCompFromOrg
Total Reportable Comp Frm Rltd Orgs0TotalReportableCompFrmRltdOrgs
Total Other Compensation441977TotalOtherCompensation
Number Individuals GT100 K27NumberIndividualsGT100K
Formers Listed1FormersListed
Total Comp GT150 K1TotalCompGT150K
Compensation From Other Sources0CompensationFromOtherSources

Contractor Compensation ContractorCompensation (5 entries)

Address Line1AddressOfContractor/AddressUS/AddressLine1CityAddressOfContractor/AddressUS/CityStateAddressOfContractor/AddressUS/StateZIP CodeAddressOfContractor/AddressUS/ZIPCodeDescription Of ServicesDescriptionOfServicesCompensationCompensation
Adams Hussey & Associates
1600 Wilson Blvd Suite 300ArlingtonVA22209DIRECT MAIL CONSULTING295758
Underground
303 Sacramento St 3rd FloorSan FranciscoCA94111Advertising216327
Blackbaud
2 Canal Park Suite 4300 4th FloorCambridgeMA02141Database Software194061
Image X
6150 Stoneridge Mall Rd Suite 200PleasantonCA94588Printing183920
Tait Subler LLC
PO Box 1575MinneapolisMN55480Brand Strategy Consulting129260
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Number Of Contractors GT100 K9NumberOfContractorsGT100K
All Other Contributions21101486AllOtherContributions
Noncash Contributions351425NoncashContributions
Total Contributions21101486TotalContributions

Program Service Revenue ProgramServiceRevenue (3 entries)

DescriptionDescriptionBusiness CodeBusinessCodeTotal Revenue ColumnTotalRevenueColumnRelated Or Exempt Function IncomeRelatedOrExemptFunctionIncome
Court Awards54110026876422687642
client COST RECOVERIES541100204825204825
Product sales90009921502150
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Revenue2894617TotalProgramServiceRevenue

Investment Income InvestmentIncome

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column590480TotalRevenueColumn
Exclusion$590,480ExclusionAmount

Gross Rents GrossRents

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Real15720Real

Rental Income Or Loss RentalIncomeOrLoss

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Real15720Real

Net Rental Income Or Loss NetRentalIncomeOrLoss

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column15720TotalRevenueColumn
Exclusion$15,720ExclusionAmount

Gross Amount Sales Assets GrossAmountSalesAssets

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Securities15727971Securities

Less Cost Oth Basis Sales Expenses LessCostOthBasisSalesExpenses

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Securities17301307Securities

Gain Or Loss GainOrLoss

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Securities-1573336Securities

Net Gain Or Loss Investments NetGainOrLossInvestments

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column-1573336TotalRevenueColumn
Exclusion-$1,573,336ExclusionAmount

Other Revenue Misc OtherRevenueMisc (2 entries)

DescriptionDescriptionBusiness CodeBusinessCodeTotal Revenue ColumnTotalRevenueColumnExclusionExclusionAmount
MAILING LIST RENTAL90009964180$64,180
Other Misc Income90009950273$50,273
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Other Revenue114453TotalOtherRevenue

Total Revenue TotalRevenue

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column23143420TotalRevenueColumn
Related Or Exempt Function Income2894617RelatedOrExemptFunctionIncome
Unrelated Business Revenue0UnrelatedBusinessRevenue
Exclusion-$852,683ExclusionAmount

Grants To Domestic Orgs GrantsToDomesticOrgs

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total89160Total
Program Services89160ProgramServices

Comp Current Officers Directors CompCurrentOfficersDirectors

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total1650459Total
Program Services1124230ProgramServices
Management And General386417ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising139812Fundraising

Comp Disqual Persons CompDisqualPersons

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total143690Total
Program Services143690ProgramServices

Other Salaries And Wages OtherSalariesAndWages

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total11006982Total
Program Services9342780ProgramServices
Management And General801173ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising863029Fundraising

Pension Plan Contributions PensionPlanContributions

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total777920Total
Program Services667977ProgramServices
Management And General51609ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising58334Fundraising

Other Employee Benefits OtherEmployeeBenefits

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total1903434Total
Program Services1560184ProgramServices
Management And General172015ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising171235Fundraising

Payroll Taxes PayrollTaxes

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total898977Total
Program Services749548ProgramServices
Management And General79676ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising69753Fundraising

Fees For Services Management FeesForServicesManagement

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total12499Total
Program Services9644ProgramServices
Management And General1697ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising1158Fundraising

Fees For Services Legal FeesForServicesLegal

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total14787Total
Program Services11021ProgramServices
Management And General1170ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising2596Fundraising

Fees For Services Accounting FeesForServicesAccounting

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total99189Total
Program Services73924ProgramServices
Management And General7850ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising17415Fundraising

Fees For Services Lobbying FeesForServicesLobbying

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total19328Total
Program Services19328ProgramServices

Fees For Services Prof Fundraising FeesForServicesProfFundraising

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total595156Total
Fundraising595156Fundraising

Fees For Services Invst Mgmnt Fees FeesForServicesInvstMgmntFees

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total145156Total
Management And General145156ManagementAndGeneral

Fees For Services Other FeesForServicesOther

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total898581Total
Program Services834734ProgramServices
Management And General34730ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising29117Fundraising

Advertising Advertising

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total554883Total
Program Services554883ProgramServices

Office Expenses OfficeExpenses

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total2056306Total
Program Services1170307ProgramServices
Management And General58677ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising827322Fundraising

Occupancy Occupancy

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total2093360Total
Program Services1675960ProgramServices
Management And General215802ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising201598Fundraising

Travel Travel

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total342016Total
Program Services297546ProgramServices
Management And General4979ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising39491Fundraising

Conferences Meetings ConferencesMeetings

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total121899Total
Program Services68941ProgramServices
Management And General44677ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising8281Fundraising

Depreciation Depletion DepreciationDepletion

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total704911Total
Program Services539566ProgramServices
Management And General83417ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising81928Fundraising

Insurance Insurance

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total76920Total
Program Services69370ProgramServices
Management And General2346ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising5204Fundraising

Other Expenses OtherExpenses (4 entries)

DescriptionDescriptionTotalTotalProgram ServicesProgramServicesManagement And GeneralManagementAndGeneralFundraisingFundraising
direct case costs732082732082
Other Contracted Svcs62596423444011143380381
miSCELLANEOUS132480113046124466988
research840607730833493403

Total Functional Expenses TotalFunctionalExpenses

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total25780199Total
Program Services20159669ProgramServices
Management And General2118329ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising3502201Fundraising
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Joint CostsXJointCosts

Total Joint Costs TotalJointCosts

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total981493Total
Program Services775379ProgramServices
Management And General0ManagementAndGeneral
Fundraising206114Fundraising

Cash Non Interest Bearing CashNonInterestBearing

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY759320BOY
EOY789439EOY

Savings And Temp Cash Investments SavingsAndTempCashInvestments

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY4976545BOY
EOY3685333EOY

Pledges And Grants Receivable PledgesAndGrantsReceivable

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY7908135BOY
EOY4169194EOY

Accounts Receivable AccountsReceivable

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY86830BOY
EOY48386EOY

Prepaid Expenses Deferred Charges PrepaidExpensesDeferredCharges

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY524809BOY
EOY696055EOY
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Land Buildings Equipment Basis5418454LandBuildingsEquipmentBasis
Land Bldg Equipment Accum Deprec3787393LandBldgEquipmentAccumDeprec

Land Buildings Equipment Basis Net LandBuildingsEquipmentBasisNet

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY2058793BOY
EOY1631061EOY

Investments Pub Traded Securities InvestmentsPubTradedSecurities

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY20658374BOY
EOY27015682EOY

Investments Other Securities InvestmentsOtherSecurities

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY871990BOY
EOY929972EOY

Other Assets Total OtherAssetsTotal

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY289080BOY
EOY305804EOY

Total Assets TotalAssets

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY38133876BOY
EOY39270926EOY

Accounts Payable Accrued Expenses AccountsPayableAccruedExpenses

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY1896934BOY
EOY2139308EOY

Other Liabilities OtherLiabilities

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY4672499BOY
EOY4754104EOY

Total Liabilities TotalLiabilities

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY6569433BOY
EOY6893412EOY
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Follow SFAS117XFollowSFAS117

Unrestricted Net Assets UnrestrictedNetAssets

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY19439481BOY
EOY19973892EOY

Temporarily Restricted Net Assets TemporarilyRestrictedNetAssets

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY10677129BOY
EOY10955789EOY

Permanently Restricted Net Assets PermanentlyRestrictedNetAssets

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY1447833BOY
EOY1447833EOY

Total Net Assets Fund Balances TotalNetAssetsFundBalances

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY31564443BOY
EOY32377514EOY

Total Liab Net Assets Fund Balances TotalLiabNetAssetsFundBalances

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY38133876BOY
EOY39270926EOY
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Method Of Accounting AccrualXMethodOfAccountingAccrual
Accountant Compile Or Review0AccountantCompileOrReview
FS Audited1FSAudited
Audit Committee1AuditCommittee
Financial Statement SeparateXFinancialStatementSeparate
Federal Grant Audit Required0FederalGrantAuditRequired

Schedule A IRS990ScheduleA

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Publicly Supported Org170b1 AviXPubliclySupportedOrg170b1Avi

Gifts Grants Contrib Received170 GiftsGrantsContribReceived170

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years17615728CurrentTaxYearMinus4Years
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years20370952CurrentTaxYearMinus3Years
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years24969338CurrentTaxYearMinus2Years
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year25712988CurrentTaxYearMinus1Year
Current Tax Year21101486CurrentTaxYear
Total109770492Total

Total170 Total170

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years17615728CurrentTaxYearMinus4Years
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years20370952CurrentTaxYearMinus3Years
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years24969338CurrentTaxYearMinus2Years
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year25712988CurrentTaxYearMinus1Year
Current Tax Year21101486CurrentTaxYear
Total109770492Total
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Amounts Subst Contributors Total10926572AmountsSubstContributorsTotal
Public Support Total17098843920PublicSupportTotal170

Gross Investment Income170 GrossInvestmentIncome170

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years512235CurrentTaxYearMinus4Years
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years586923CurrentTaxYearMinus3Years
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years861808CurrentTaxYearMinus2Years
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year744412CurrentTaxYearMinus1Year
Current Tax Year590480CurrentTaxYear
Total3295858Total

Other Income170 OtherIncome170

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years63849CurrentTaxYearMinus4Years
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years47956CurrentTaxYearMinus3Years
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years53862CurrentTaxYearMinus2Years
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year64343CurrentTaxYearMinus1Year
Current Tax Year114456CurrentTaxYear
Total344466Total
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Support113410816TotalSupport
Gross Receipts From Admissions Etc13440403GrossReceiptsFromAdmissionsEtc
Public Support Pertcentage1700.87160PublicSupportPertcentage170
Public Support Pertcent Prior Year0.86810PublicSupportPertcentPriorYear
Thirty Three Percnt Tests CY170XThirtyThreePercntTestsCY170
General ExplanationSchedule A, Part II, Line 10, Explanation of Other Income: MISCELLANEOUS mailing list rentalGeneralExplanation

Schedule B IRS990ScheduleB

Contributor Info ContributorInfo

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Contributor NumberRESTRICTEDContributorNumber

Contributor Name Business ContributorNameBusiness

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1RESTRICTEDBusinessNameLine1

Contributor Address US ContributorAddressUS

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1RESTRICTEDAddressLine1
Address Line2RESTRICTEDAddressLine2
CityRESTRICTEDCity
StateRESTRICTEDState
ZIP CodeRESTRICTEDZIPCode
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Aggregate ContributionsRESTRICTEDAggregateContributions

Schedule C IRS990ScheduleC

Total Grassroots Lobbying TotalGrassrootsLobbying

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals52422FilingOrganizationsTotals

Total Direct Lobbying TotalDirectLobbying

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals235354FilingOrganizationsTotals

Total Lobbying Expenditures TotalLobbyingExpenditures

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals287776FilingOrganizationsTotals

Other Exempt Purpose Expenditures OtherExemptPurposeExpenditures

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals25492423FilingOrganizationsTotals

Total Exempt Purpose Expenditures TotalExemptPurposeExpenditures

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals25780199FilingOrganizationsTotals

Lobbying Nontaxable LobbyingNontaxableAmount

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals1000000FilingOrganizationsTotals

Grassroots Nontaxable GrassrootsNontaxableAmount

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals250000FilingOrganizationsTotals

Tot Lobbying Grassroot Minus Non Tx TotLobbyingGrassrootMinusNonTx

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals0FilingOrganizationsTotals

Tot Lobby Expend Mns Lobbying Nontx TotLobbyExpendMnsLobbyingNontx

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Totals0FilingOrganizationsTotals

Lobbying Nontaxable Amount2 LobbyingNontaxableAmount2

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus31000000CurrentYearMinus3
Current Year Minus21000000CurrentYearMinus2
Current Year Minus11000000CurrentYearMinus1
Current Year1000000CurrentYear
Total4000000Total
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Lobbying Ceiling$6,000,000LobbyingCeilingAmount

Total Lobbying Expenditures2 TotalLobbyingExpenditures2

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3474613CurrentYearMinus3
Current Year Minus2455350CurrentYearMinus2
Current Year Minus1386418CurrentYearMinus1
Current Year287776CurrentYear
Total1604157Total

Grassroots Nontaxable Amount2 GrassrootsNontaxableAmount2

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3250000CurrentYearMinus3
Current Year Minus2250000CurrentYearMinus2
Current Year Minus1250000CurrentYearMinus1
Current Year250000CurrentYear
Total1000000Total
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Grassroots Ceiling$1,500,000GrassrootsCeilingAmount

Grassroots Lobbying Expenditures GrassrootsLobbyingExpenditures

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3214325CurrentYearMinus3
Current Year Minus2144692CurrentYearMinus2
Current Year Minus1138528CurrentYearMinus1
Current Year52422CurrentYear
Total549967Total

Schedule D IRS990ScheduleD

Current Year CurrentYear

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Of Year Balance1273350BeginningOfYearBalance
Investment Earnings Or Losses173131InvestmentEarningsOrLosses
Other Expenditures78842OtherExpenditures
End Of Year Balance1367639EndOfYearBalance

Current Year Minus1 Year CurrentYearMinus1Year

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Of Year Balance1447835BeginningOfYearBalance
Investment Earnings Or Losses-174485InvestmentEarningsOrLosses
End Of Year Balance1273350EndOfYearBalance
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Permanent Endowment EOY Balance1.00000PermanentEndowmentEOYBalance
Endowments Held By Unrelated Orgs0EndowmentsHeldByUnrelatedOrgs
Endowments Held By Related Orgs0EndowmentsHeldByRelatedOrgs

Land Land

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis232880OtherCostOrOtherBasis
Book Value232880BookValue

Buildings Buildings

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis135174OtherCostOrOtherBasis
Depreciation88817Depreciation
Book Value46357BookValue

Leasehold Improvements LeaseholdImprovements

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis1834468OtherCostOrOtherBasis
Depreciation1610700Depreciation
Book Value223768BookValue

Equipment Equipment

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis2413941OtherCostOrOtherBasis
Depreciation1387563Depreciation
Book Value1026378BookValue

Other Land Buildings OtherLandBuildings

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis801991OtherCostOrOtherBasis
Depreciation700313Depreciation
Book Value101678BookValue
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Of Book Value Land Buildings1631061TotalOfBookValueLandBuildings

Other Liabilities OtherLiabilities (2 entries)

DescriptionDescriptionAmountAmount
client trust funds$256,499
LIABILITIES RELATING TO SPLIT INTEREST GIFT AGREEMENTS$4,497,605
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Of Amounts4754104TotalOfAmounts
Total Revenue23143420TotalRevenue
Total Expenses25780199TotalExpenses
Excess Or Deficit For Year-2636779ExcessOrDeficitForYear
Net Unrealized GL On Investments2904363NetUnrealizedGLOnInvestments
Other$545,487OtherAmount
Total Adjustments3449850TotalAdjustments
Excess Or Deficit Per FS813071ExcessOrDeficitPerFS
Tot Revenue Etc Audited Fincl Stmt33839755TotRevenueEtcAuditedFinclStmt
Net Unrealized Gains Investments2904363NetUnrealizedGainsInvestments
Donated Srvc And Use Of Facilities7262205DonatedSrvcAndUseOfFacilities
Other Revenues545487OtherRevenues
Revenue Not Rptd F99010712055RevenueNotRptdF990
Revenue Subtotal23127700RevenueSubtotal
Other Revenues Not Included15720OtherRevenuesNotIncluded
Revenue Not Rptd On Fin Stmt15720RevenueNotRptdOnFinStmt
Total Revenue Per Form99023143420TotalRevenuePerForm990
Tot Expenses Etc Audited Fincl Stmt33026684TotExpensesEtcAuditedFinclStmt
Donated Services Use Of Facilities7262205DonatedServicesUseOfFacilities
Expenses Not Rptd F9907262205ExpensesNotRptdF990
Expenses Subtotal25764479ExpensesSubtotal
Other Expenses Not Included15720OtherExpensesNotIncluded
Expenses Not Rptd On Fin Stmt15720ExpensesNotRptdOnFinStmt
Total Expenses Per Form99025780199TotalExpensesPerForm990

Form990 Schedule D Part XIV Form990ScheduleDPartXIV (6 entries)

IdentifierIdentifierReturn ReferenceReturnReferenceExplanationExplanation
Part V, Line 4:Description of Intended Use of Endowment Funds:The endowment funds are separated into four categories, each based on a different spending restriction as stipulated by the donor. 5% of the endowment funds are used each year to support litigation programs in accordance with the spending restrictions of the four categories.
Part X:Description of Uncertain Tax Positions Under FIN 48:Earthjustice adopted the provisions of accounting for uncertain tax positions on July 1, 2009. Earthjustice had no unrecognized tax benefits which would require an adjustment to the July 1, 2009, beginning balance of net assets and had no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2010. Earthjustice files exempt organization returns and, if applicable, unrelated business income tax returns in the U.S. federal and California jurisdictions.
Part XI, Line 8 - Other Adjustments:Change IN SPLIT INTEREST Agreements: 545487.
Part XII, Line 2d - Other Adjustments:CHANGE IN SPLIT INTEREST Agreements: 545487.
Part XII, Line 4b - Other Adjustments:RENTAL INCOME RECLASSIFIED FROM EXPENSE SECTION: 15720.
Part XIII, Line 4b - Other Adjustments:RENTAL INCOME RECLASSIFIED TO REVENUES SECTION: 15720.

Schedule F IRS990ScheduleF

Accts Actvs Out US Table AcctsActvsOutUSTable

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
RegionEuropeRegion
Number Of Employees1NumberOfEmployees
Type Of Activities ConductedPROGRAM SERVICESTypeOfActivitiesConducted
Specific Services ProvidedAdvocacy at UNSpecificServicesProvided
Total Expenditures10469TotalExpenditures
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Number Of Offices0TotalNumberOfOffices
Total Number Of Employees1TotalNumberOfEmployees
Total Amount Spent10469TotalAmountSpent

Schedule G IRS990ScheduleG

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Mail SolicitationsXMailSolicitations
Email SolicitationsXEmailSolicitations
Phone SolicitationsXPhoneSolicitations
In Person SolicitationsXInPersonSolicitations
Solicitation Of Non Govt GrantsXSolicitationOfNonGovtGrants
Special Fundraising EventsXSpecialFundraisingEvents
Agreement Ref Fundraising1AgreementRefFundraising

Fundraiser Activity Information FundraiserActivityInformation (6 entries)

ActivityActivityFundraiser Control Of FundsFundraiserControlOfFundsGross ReceiptsGrossReceiptsAmount Retained By ContractorAmountRetainedByContractorNet To OrganizationNetToOrganization
Adams Hussey & Associates Inc
DIRECT MAIL CONSULTANT029073772958272611550
Telefund Inc
TELEMARKETING01343079887535432
Outreach Associates Inc
TELEMARKETING0662403299833242
Your Voice Media Inc
TELEMARKETING04052871159-30631
Donor Services Group LLC
Telemarketing03808163288-25207
Share Group Inc
Telemarketing01975133009-13258
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Gross Receipts3206284TotalGrossReceipts
Total Retained By Contractors595156TotalRetainedByContractors
Total Net To Organization2611128TotalNetToOrganization
Licensed StatesALLicensedStates
Licensed StatesAKLicensedStates
Licensed StatesAZLicensedStates
Licensed StatesARLicensedStates
Licensed StatesCALicensedStates
Licensed StatesCTLicensedStates
Licensed StatesFLLicensedStates
Licensed StatesGALicensedStates
Licensed StatesHILicensedStates
Licensed StatesILLicensedStates
Licensed StatesKSLicensedStates
Licensed StatesKYLicensedStates
Licensed StatesLALicensedStates
Licensed StatesMDLicensedStates
Licensed StatesMALicensedStates
Licensed StatesMELicensedStates
Licensed StatesMILicensedStates
Licensed StatesMNLicensedStates
Licensed StatesMSLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNHLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNJLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNMLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNYLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNCLicensedStates
Licensed StatesOHLicensedStates
Licensed StatesOKLicensedStates
Licensed StatesORLicensedStates
Licensed StatesPALicensedStates
Licensed StatesRILicensedStates
Licensed StatesSCLicensedStates
Licensed StatesTNLicensedStates
Licensed StatesUTLicensedStates
Licensed StatesVALicensedStates
Licensed StatesWALicensedStates
Licensed StatesWVLicensedStates
Licensed StatesWILicensedStates
Licensed StatesMOLicensedStates
Licensed StatesCOLicensedStates
Licensed StatesDELicensedStates
Licensed StatesIDLicensedStates
Licensed StatesINLicensedStates
Licensed StatesIALicensedStates
Licensed StatesMTLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNELicensedStates
Licensed StatesNVLicensedStates
Licensed StatesNDLicensedStates
Licensed StatesSDLicensedStates
Licensed StatesTXLicensedStates
Licensed StatesVTLicensedStates
Licensed StatesWYLicensedStates

Schedule I IRS990ScheduleI

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Records Maintained1RecordsMaintained

Recipient Table RecipientTable (4 entries)

Address Line1AddressUS/AddressLine1CityAddressUS/CityStateAddressUS/StateZIP CodeAddressUS/ZIPCodeEIN Of RecipientEINOfRecipientIRC SectionIRCSectionAmount Of Cash GrantAmountOfCashGrantPurpose Of GrantPurposeOfGrant
Environmental Defense Fund
257 Park Avenue SouthNew YorkNY10010521379661501(C)(3)6000Membership dues
The Wilderness Society
1615 M St NWWASHINGTONDC20036530167933501(C)(3)6000Membership dues
World Resources Institute
10 G Street NE Suite 800WASHINGTONDC20002521257057501(C)(3)55000Legislative analysis
Gulf Coast Fund co Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
6 West 48th Street 10th FloorNew YorkNY10036133615533501(C)(3)8200Passthrough of Gulf Spill donations
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Nbr Of501 C3 And Govt Grants4TotalNbrOf501C3AndGovtGrants
Total Nbr Of Other Organizations0TotalNbrOfOtherOrganizations

Form990 Schedule I Part IV Form990ScheduleIPartIV

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
IdentifierProcedure for Monitoring Grants in the U.S.:Identifier
Return ReferencePart I, Line 2:ReturnReference
ExplanationSchedule I, Part I, Line 2: Grants and/or assistance are usually provided to other organizations with which Earthjustice works closely and is familiar, for purposes related to common interests and endeavors on particular environmental issues. Those purposes are consistent with the mission of Earthjustice and the restrictions on 501(c)(3) organizations, whether or not the recipient is a 501(c)(3) organization. The recipients' use of funds is monitored as part of Earthjustice's involvement in the issues of shared interest.Explanation

Schedule J IRS990ScheduleJ

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Independent ConsultantXIndependentConsultant
Compensation SurveyXCompensationSurvey
Board Or Committee ApprovalXBoardOrCommitteeApproval
Severance Payment0SeverancePayment
Supplemental Nonqual Retire Plan0SupplementalNonqualRetirePlan
Equity Based Comp Arrangement0EquityBasedCompArrangement
Comp Based On Revenue Of Filing Org0CompBasedOnRevenueOfFilingOrg
Comp Based On Revenue Related Orgs0CompBasedOnRevenueRelatedOrgs
Comp Based Net Earnings Filing Org0CompBasedNetEarningsFilingOrg
Comp Based Net Earnings Relate Orgs0CompBasedNetEarningsRelateOrgs
Any Non Fixed Payments0AnyNonFixedPayments
Initial Contract Exception0InitialContractException

Form990 Schedule J Part II Form990ScheduleJPartII (13 entries)

Base Compensation Filing OrgBaseCompensationFilingOrgComp Based On Related OrgsCompBasedOnRelatedOrgsBonus Filing OrgBonusFilingOrgBonus Related OrgsBonusRelatedOrgsOther Compensation Filing OrgOtherCompensationFilingOrgOther Compensation Related OrgsOtherCompensationRelatedOrgsDeferred Comp Filing OrgDeferredCompFilingOrgDeferred Comp Related OrgsDeferredCompRelatedOrgsNontaxable Benefits Filing OrgNontaxableBenefitsFilingOrgNontaxable Benefits Related OrgsNontaxableBenefitsRelatedOrgsTotal Compensation Filing OrgTotalCompensationFilingOrgTotal Compensation Related OrgsTotalCompensationRelatedOrgsComp Report Prior990 Filing OrgCompReportPrior990FilingOrgComp Report Prior990 Related OrgsCompReportPrior990RelatedOrgs
DONNELL VAN NOPPEN
28160400000269660166170325187000
MELINDA CARMACK
16928500000202500163470205882000
MARTIN HAYDEN
15445500000183950197670192617000
WILLIAM CURTISS
15444200000179900211750193607000
BARBARA DRAGO
1483720000016613098920174877000
BRUCE NEIGHBOR
14224600000162340211440179624000
PATTI GOLDMAN
18175600000224260198390224021000
GEORGIA MCINTOSH
14308600000162860211450180517000
DAVID BARON
13723200000152610154300167923000
TODD TRUE
13855500000151550118680165578000
DAVID GUEST
1371000000014877030950155072000
PAUL ACHITOFF
1359240000014879099790160782000
VAWTER PARKER
13114900000131350194240163708000

Schedule M IRS990ScheduleM

Securities Publicly Traded SecuritiesPubliclyTraded

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Non Cash CheckboxXNonCashCheckbox
Number Of Contributions68NumberOfContributions
Noncash Contribs Rptd F990351425NoncashContribsRptdF990
Method Of Determining RevenuesFMV AT DONATION DATEMethodOfDeterminingRevenues
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Any Property That Must Be Held0AnyPropertyThatMustBeHeld
Review Process Unusual NC Gifts1ReviewProcessUnusualNCGifts
Third Parties Used1ThirdPartiesUsed

Form990 Schedule M Part II Form990ScheduleMPartII

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
IdentifierThird Party Use:Identifier
Return ReferencePart I, Line 32b:ReturnReference
ExplanationFrom time to time, donors have contributed real property, usually into a charitable remainder trust. When this happens, a real estate agent will be hired to assist in selling the property.Explanation

Schedule O IRS990ScheduleO

General Explanation GeneralExplanation (16 entries)

IdentifierIdentifierExplanationExplanationReturn ReferenceReturnReference
Form 990, Part VI, Section B, line 11A full public inspection copy of Form 990 is posted on a secure web portal accesssible by the trustees at least one week prior to filing. The trustees are notified of the Form 990 posting and encouraged to review and comment on it prior to filing.
Form 990, Part VI, Section B, line 12cThe conflict of interest prevention policy requires an annual disclosure by trustees and senior staff of entities in which they have personal, financial or professional interests. The results of those disclosures are compiled into a screening list of entities used by the board chair, chief executive officer and general counsel when reviewing potential transactions between Earthjustice and outside entities. The screening list is used to check to assure that individual decision-makers recuse themselves from any participation in decisions affecting the entities in which they have interests.
Form 990, Part VI, Section B, line 15We get competitive data from an outside compensation consultant for our CEO. In addition our VP-HR collects salaries of CEOs from other non-profit environmental organizations to obtain additional data for the key national non-profit environmental organizations. This information is passed along to the Executive Committee of our Board of Directors who reviews the data and makes the appropriate recommendation for our CEO salary. We do a bi-annual review of all positions in the organization including the CEO and all staff. We update all position descriptions and use an outside compensation consultant to determine salaries that match the job responsibilities in the non-profit sector in the specific geographic areas in which our jobs are located. Our VP-HR also contacts other environmental non-profit companies to obtain additional competitive information. For non-attorney jobs, each job is assigned a grade. Each grade has a minimum, midpoint, and maximum salary. We consider mid-point of the grade the appropriate salary to be an employee fully competent in the job. Our VP-HR then works with managers, based on performance to determine what the appropriate salary should be within this range. Since this process is quite time intensive, we do this every other year. In the year we don't go through this process, we get competitive data about what the average raise will be and use this as a guideline for our budgeting process. Our attorneys' pay is based on year of graduation from law school to which we add a geographic adjustment based on the office location, i.e. Bozeman, Montana vs. New York, NY. We contact competitors like the Sierra Club and also government entities like the Department of Justice to determine the appropriate pay for our attorneys.
Form 990, Part VI, Section C, line 19THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, THE GOVERNING/ORGANIZING DOCUMENTS AND THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC BY EMAIL REQUEST: eajus@earthjustice.org. The organization's audited financial statements are also available on the organization's website.
Form 990, Part IIIreasonable recovery for sources of renewable energy distributed through the electric utility grid. Name: Grid Interconnection Rule Amendments Number: 2032 Clients: Hawaii Solar Energy Association Summary: This proceeding before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Hawai'i affects access to the electric utility grid for distributed providers of renewable energy seeking to sell electricity to consumers. B. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative - Northeastern States Name: RGGI - Indeck Challenge Number: 1764 Clients: Environment Action of New York, Conservation Law Foundation, Pace Energy & Climate Center, EDF, NRDC Summary: In this suit, we are supporting the State of New York's implementation of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. C. California Name: CEC Carlsbad PP Intervention Number: 1810 Clients: CBD Summary: This case seeks to ensure that the California Energy Commission analyzes and requires feasible mitigations for greenhouse gas emissions from a proposed natural gas-fired power plant in Carlsbad, California. Name: CPUC LTPP (CA PUC Long-Term Procurement Plans) Number: 2047 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This proceeding before the California Public Utilities Commission seeks to assure that long-term plans of the three major investor-owned utilities in California rely on increased efficiency and renewable energy sources to meet electricity needs. IV. Stop The Growing Reliance On Dirty Fuels Name: Chevron CEQA Number: 1802 Clients: West County Toxics Coalition, Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Communities for a Better Environment Summary: This case challenges the City of Richmond's approval of a major upgrade at the Chevron refinery intended to allow the refinery to process "dirtier" crude oil that would further increase the release of greenhouse gases and other toxic pollutants in this community. Name: Alberta Clipper Pipeline Number: 1884 Clients: Indigenous Environmental Network, Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Sierra Club, NWF Summary: This case challenges a State Department permit for a US-Canada pipeline to supply US refineries with dirty synthetic crude oil from Alberta tar sands. Name: Oil Shale - Resource Management Plans Number: 1864 Clients: TWS, NRDC, CO Environmental Coalition, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, NWF, Center for Native Ecosystems, SUWA, W. CO Congress, Wilderness Workshop Summary: This case challenges BLM's decision setting aside two million acres of public land for oil shale leasing. Name: Oil Shale - Regulations Number: 1865 Clients: TWS, NRDC, CO Environmental Coalition, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, NWF, Center for Native Ecosystems, SUWA, W. CO Congress, Wilderness Workshop Summary: This case challenges the Bush Administration's last-minute regulations promoting polluting oil shale development on public lands. Earthjustice is a public interest law firm that provides legal services to citizens and citizen groups at no cost. Our cases are brought to promote the public's interest in preserving wildlife and other natural resources for the benefit of future generations, and to protect the public's interest in a clean, healthy environment. The relief sought in our cases does not inure to the financial benefit of our clients or any private interest. The cases below represent the matters in litigation during the tax year, grouped into categories according to the goals of our work. CURB THE SOURCES OF HEAT-TRAPPING GASES THAT THREATEN CATASTROPHIC CHANGES IN OUR CLIMATE Cases that address the root causes of global warming are described here, except for coal plants and coal mining, which have been moved to the next section. Additional cases that involve the manifold effects of global warming are summarized under the relevant heading, such as water, public lands, or wildlife. I. Obtain Stronger Energy Efficiency Standards We have settled our past litigation challenging weak Bush administration energy efficiency standards for distribution transformers and residential furnaces and boilers. We are advocating for strong interpretations of the law on remand of these standards and the initial development of many others. Name: Direct Heating Equipment Number: 2083 Clients: NRDC Summary: In this case, Earthjustice is defending the Department of Energy's efficiency standards for direct heating equipment against an industry challenge seeking to overturn them. II. Seek Federal Limits On Greenhouse Gas Pollution Name: CAA Greenhouse Gases Number: 1503 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges EPA's refusal to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. Name: GHG Endangerment Finding Number: 2033 Clients: EDF Summary: This case is a challenge by industry groups to EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act; Earthjustice is helping to defend EPA's power to limit emissions. Name: Boilers NSPS Number: 1499 Clients: EDF, Sierra Club Summary: This suit is a challenge to EPA's performance standards for new and modified power plants, which fail to adequately regulate both greenhouse gases and conventional air pollutants. Name: Petroleum Refinery NSPS Number: 1819 Clients: Sierra Club, NRDC, EIP Summary: This case challenges EPA's failure to adequately limit greenhouse gas emissions and other pollution from new and modified petroleum refineries. Name: Ships, Aircraft, and Non-Road GHGs Number: 2046 Clients: Friends of the Earth, CBD, Oceana Summary: This case seeks to force EPA to limit greenhouse gas and black carbon emissions from ships and aircraft, as required by the Clean Air Act. Name: EU Aircraft GHG Regulations Number: 2042 Clients: CBD, EDF Summary: This is a case in British court brought by US airlines to overturn European rules that would make greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft subject to the European Union greenhouse gas Emission Trading System. Name: GHG Reporting Rule Number: 1916 Clients: EDF, Sierra Club, NRDC Summary: This case would compel EPA to promulgate a final rule to require the reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors of the U.S. economy. III. Promote Effective State And Regional Initiatives A. Hawai'i Name: Hawai'i Clean Energy Planning Framework Number: 1976 Clients: Hawaii Solar Energy Association Summary: This is an administrative proceeding before the Hawai'i Public Utilities Commission in which Earthjustice is supporting clean energy resources, public transparency, and accountability. Name: Hawaii Feed-In Tariffs Number: 2005 Clients: Hawaii Solar Energy Association Summary: This is a proceeding before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Hawai'i in which Earthjustice is advocating fair andCase Summaries
Form 990, Part IIILESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON AND THE HARMFUL IMPACTS OF COAL I. Stop New Coal-Fired Power Plants Name: Sunflower Coal Plant Air Permit Number: 1194 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This action challenges an air permit issued by the State of Kansas for the proposed Holcomb Generating Station. Name: Sunflower RUS NEPA Number: 1703 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges the federal Department of Agriculture's failure to prepare an environmental impact statement in conjunction with funding for the proposed Holcomb power plant. Name: EKPC Lien Accommodation Number: 2043 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges financial support provided by the federal Rural Utilities Service for a new coal plant to be built by the East Kentucky Power Cooperative in Clark County, Kentucky. Name: Desert Rock Number: 1152 Clients: Dine Care, Sierra Club, WildEarth Guardians, Grand Canyon Trust, San Juan Citizens Alliance Summary: This suit challenges the air quality permit for Sithe Global Power's proposed coal-fired power plant on the Navajo Reservation in New Mexico. Name: White Pine Coal Plant Number: 1679 Clients: Bristlecone Alliance, Sevier Citizens for Clean Air and Water, Sierra Club, CBD, Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, Great Basin Resource Watch, Post Carbon Salt Lake, Nevada Wildlife Federation, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, Western Resource Advocates, NPCA Summary: This is an appeal of BLM's approval of rights-of-way and a subsequent land sale for the White Pine Energy Station, a coal-fired power plant proposed for eastern Nevada. Name: Dry Fork Coal-Fired Power Plant Number: 1702 Clients: Powder River Basin Resource Council, Sierra Club, Wyoming Outdoor Council Summary: This case challenges the air quality permit issued by the State of Wyoming for a proposed new coal-fired power plant near Gillette. II. Clean Up Or Shut Down Existing Coal Plants Name: Centralia Coal Plant - Permit Renewal Number: 1866 Clients: Sierra Club, NPCA, NW Environmental Defense Center Summary: This case is a challenge to an air permit issued by the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board for failure to adequately control emissions of greenhouse gases, mercury and haze-inducing particulate matter.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIIII. Ensure That New Transmission Lines Facilitate Renewable Energy Sources And Not Continued Dependence On Fossil Fuels Name: PATH Number: 1956 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This is a Virginia administrative proceeding in which Earthjustice is opposing approval of new electric transmission lines that would open up new energy markets in the Northeast for dirty, coal-fired power plants in West Virginia. Name: West-Wide Energy Corridors Number: 1922 Clients: Bark, CBD, Defenders of Wildlife, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center, NPCA, National Trust for Historic Preservation, NRDC, OR Natural Desert Association, Sierra Club, SUWA, Western Resource Advocates, Western Watersheds Project, TWS, County of San Miguel, Colorado Summary: This case challenges the federal designation of energy transmission corridors in the western United States for failing to consider and maximize renewable energy and energy conservation IV. Protect Health And Communities From Toxic Coal Plant Waste Name: Kensington II Number: 1317 Clients: Lynn Canal Conservation, Sierra Club, Southeast AK Conservation Council Summary: This is a challenge to a national Corps of Engineers regulation allowing the discharge of otherwise-prohibited toxic mine tailings and wastewater into lakes and streams. Name: Hatfield's Ferry Number: 1883 Clients: Citizens Coal Council, Environmental Integrity Project Summary: This is a Pennsylvania permit proceeding in which Earthjustice is seeking to require installation of more effective controls for water pollution at one of Pennsylvania's dirtiest coal-fired power plants. Name: TVA Scrubber Permit Appeal Number: 1990 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: In this appeal of a Clean Water Act permit, Earthjustice seeks to prevent toxic discharges of heavy metals from a new wet Flue Gas Desulfurization system at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant. Name: Coal Plant Effluent Limitation Guidelines Number: 2014 Clients: Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks to compel prompt action by EPA to set national standards regulating water pollution from power plants. Name: Coal Ash FOIA Number: 2006 Clients: Sierra Club, Environmental Integrity Project Summary: This case seeks public release of documents from EPA related to storage capacity, inspection results, and records of violations of more than 50 coal ash impoundments nationwide. V. End Mountaintop Removal Mining Name: Camp Branch Surface & Luxare E. Mine Permits Number: 1505 & 1527 Clients: WV Highlands Conservancy, OH Valley Environmental Coalition, Coal River Mountain Watch Summary: These two cases seek to overturn permits issued by the Corps of Engineers that would allow Appalachian streams and valleys to be buried under waste rock removed to allow mining access to nearby coal seams. Name: Stream Buffer Zone Rule Number: 1862 Clients: Sierra Club, Coal River Mountain Watch, WV Highlands Conservancy, OH Valley Environmental Coalition Summary: This is a challenge to a 2008 DOI rule change that weakens the "stream buffer rule", which formerly prohibited mining and waste disposal activities within 100 feet of streams except under very narrow circumstances. Name: WV Coal Mines 402 Enforcement Number: 2054 Clients: Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Coal River Mountain Watch, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Summary: This lawsuit challenges the discharge of harmful pollutants into West Virginia waters from 15 surface and underground coal mining operations in of Clean Water Act permit limitations. VI. Limit Global Warming Pollution From Western Coal Mining Name: West Elk Coal Methane Drilling Number: 1711 Clients: Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action Summary:. This is a challenge to a decision by the U.S. Forest Service and Interior Department to permit an underground coal mine to release significant amounts of methane - a potent greenhouse gas - directly into the atmosphere. Name: Otter Creek Coal Lease Number: 2008 Clients: Montana Environmental Information Center, Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks to prevent development of the proposed Otter Creek strip mine in southeastern Montana. PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH FROM THE MOST HARMFUL AIR POLLUTION I. Strengthen ozone (smog) & particulate (soot) standards & enforcement A. Strengthen National Air Regulations Name: Ozone Standards Number: 1780 Clients: American Lung Association, EDF, NRDC, NPCA, Appalachian Mountain Club Summary: This case seeks to strengthen national air quality standards for ozone that fail to adequately protect public health. Name: Ozone Phase 2 Number: 1548 Clients: NRDC Summary: This suit challenges a 2005 EPA rulemaking that waives key pollution control requirements for areas that violate national air quality standards for smog. Name: Ozone Rules Implementation Number: 1549 Clients: EDF, NRDC, American Lung Association, Sierra Club Summary: This suit seeks to overturn EPA rules that are not legally adequate to implement a more stringent new national air quality standard for smog. Name: 185 Fee Guidance Number: 2035 Clients: NRDC Summary: This case challenges EPA guidance waiving the Clean Air Act requirement that major sources of ozone pollution pay emissions fees in the worst-polluted areas. Name: PM-2.5 Implementation Rule Number: 1662 Clients: American Lung Association, Medical Advocates for Healthy Air, NRDC and Sierra Club. Summary: This is a challenge to an EPA rule that attempts to relax requirements for state plans to clean up fine particulate matter pollution. Name: PM2.5 NSR Rule Number: 1791 & 2017 Clients: NRDC, Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges an EPA rule that fails to rigorously regulate fine particulate matter pollution from new or modified large emission sources. Name: Smog Reduction Plans Number: 1984 Clients: NRDC Summary: This action challenges an EPA rule relaxing requirements for cuts in smog-producing emissions in areas that violate health-based air quality standards for ozone. Name: Coal Prep Plant NSPS Number: 1998 Clients: Sierra Club, So. App. Mtn. Stewards, App. Voices Summary: This is a challenge to national air pollution standards for coal preparation and processing plants that do not control emissions of coal dust from road traffic. Name: Marine Diesel Emissions III Number: 1653 Client: Friends of the Earth Summary: This the latest in a series of cases seeking to compel EPA to limit pollution from diesel engines in large ships as required by the Clean Air Act. Summary: Category 3 marine diesel engines powering large ocean-going vessels such as B. Clean Up Ozone And Particulate Pollution In California's Central Valley Name: ISR Intervention Number: 1672 Clients: EDF, Sierra Club Summary: In this case, we are joining with the San Joaquin Valley Air District to defeat an attempt by the National Association of Home Builders to eliminate a regulation requiring developers to mitigate the air emissions indirectly associated with new sprawl in the Valley. Name: California Ag Exemption Number: 1736 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This case aims to eliminate an EPA-approved loophole in the California state air pollution cleanup plan that exempts agricultural activity from regulation even though agriculture is a major contributor to air pollution in the Valley. Name: SJV 8-Hour Ozone Deadline Number: 2057 Clients: Medical Advocates for Healthy Air, Sierra Club Summary: This deadline action challenges EPA's unlawful failure to approve or disapprove the air quality control plan for ozone in the San Joaquin Valley. Name: SJV 1-Hour Ozone SIP Number: 2058 Clients: Medical Advocates for Healthy Air, Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges EPA's belated approval of a defective air quality cleanup plan for ozone in the San Joaquin Valley. II. Reduce Emissions Of Air Toxics Name: Power Plants Deadline Number: 1852 Clients: Sierra Club, Ohio Environmental Council, Conservation Law Foundation, Waterkeeper Alliance, Physicians for Social Responsibility, NRDC, EDF, Natural Resources Council of Maine, American Nurses Association Summary: This case would compel EPA to issue long-overdue emission standards limiting toxic pollution from power plants. Name: Cement Kilns III Number: 1506 Clients: Huron Environmental Activist League, Downwinders at Risk, Montanans Against Toxic Burning, Sierra Club, Desert Citizens Against Pollution, Friends of Hudson Summary: This is the latest in a series of cases challenging inadequate emission standards set by EPA for Portland cement kilnsCase Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIName: Brick Kilns Deadline Number: 1698 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks to compel EPA to adopt new standards for air toxics emitted by brick and ceramics kilns to replace those overturned as deficient by the Court of Appeals in our prior case. Name: Medical Waste Incinerators Number: 2016 Client: Sierra Club, NRDC Summary: Earthjustice has intervened in this industry lawsuit challenging EPA's Clean Air Act emission standards for hospital, medical, and infectious waste incinerators in order to defend those standards against attack. Name: Chemical Manufacturing Intervention Number: 2028 Clients: Sierra Club, Louisiana Environmental Action Network Summary: Here, Earthjustice is opposing industry legal action that would overturn Clean Air Act emission standards covering more than 400 chemical manufacturing plants nationwide. Name: 2000 MACT Deadline Number: 1494 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks overdue national regulations to control emissions from more than 80 categories of major sources of hazardous air pollutants and as well as more than 50 categories of smaller pollution sources. Name: Medical Waste Incinerators Number: 1529 Client: Sierra Club, NRDC Summary: This suit seeks to force EPA to write minimum standards governing emissions from medical waste incinerators as required by a 1999 court order. Name: CIWI III Number: 1509 Clients: Sierra Club, Louisiana Environmental Action Network Summary: This case challenges an EPA decision rejecting our petition to reconsider certain deficiencies in regulations covering commercial and industrial waste incinerators. Name: Hazardous Waste Combustors Number: 1521 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This suit seeks to overturn inadequate regulations issued by EPA for hazardous waste incinerators. Name: Large Municipal Waste Combustors Number: 1526 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This is a challenge EPA's nation-wide regulations for large trash incinerators that were not set based on the performance of the cleanest existing facilities as the Clean Air Act requires. Name: Solid Waste Incinerators Number: 1544 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This suit challenges 2005 EPA standards for certain waste incinerators that illegally exempt many waste-burning facilities from regulation. Name: Steel Mills Emission Standards Number: 1556 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges EPA regulations that fail to reduce toxic pollution from most iron and steel manufacturing plants. Name: Mercury Cell Chlorine Plants Number: 1530 Clients: NRDC, Sierra Club Summary: This is a challenge to EPA standards that fail to control the overwhelming majority of mercury emissions from chlorine-manufacturing plants. Name: CAA Plywood Plants Standards Number: 1504 Client: Sierra Club Summary: In this case, we are both challenging the adequacy of certain standards set by EPA for toxic pollution from plywood plants and defending others that industry is trying to invalidate. Name: Start-Up, Shut-Down, Malfunction Loophole Number: 1554 Clients: Sierra Club, NRDC Summary: This case aims to overturn an EPA-created loophole that would allow more than 100,000 facilities across the country to escape compliance with emission standards whenever they start up, shut down, or malfunction and challenges rule revisions that unlawfully block public access to toxic emissions information. Name: MACT Hammer Number: 1528 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This suit seeks to overturn EPA regulations that delay new pollution controls and create new loopholes in emission standards. Name: SSM Loophole Interventions Number: 2021 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This is an industry case brought to weaken standards for toxic emissions from plywood plants and aluminum plants when they start up, shut down, or malfunction; Earthjustice is defending those standards in the litigation. Name: Halogenated Solvents Number: 1667 Clients: PennFuture, Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges EPA's inadequate standards for carcinogenic emissions from industrial plants that use halogenated solvent cleaners. Name: Dry Cleaners Number: 1515 Client: Sierra Club Summary: This suit seeks to set aside standards for emissions of perchloroethylene (a known human carcinogen) from dry cleaning facilities issued by EPA without adequately considering a switch to alternative cleaning methods. Name: Site Remediation HAPs Number: 1553 Clients: Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety, Sierra Club, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League Summary: This is a challenge to EPAs illegal exemption of toxic waste site cleanup from Clean Air Act requirements. Name: 2003 Deadlines Number: 1496 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks to compel EPA to issue long-overdue, health-based standards and update its technology-based standards for hazardous organic air pollutants for seven categories of sources. Name: PVC Deadline Case Number: 1713 Clients: Sierra Club, Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Mossville Environmental Action Now Summary: This case seeks to compel EPA to promulgate new standards for polyvinyl chloride plastics plants to replace the defective standards vacated by the court in a prior Earthjustice case. Name: 2008 Deadlines Number: 1854 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks court-ordered deadlines for EPA to conduct residual health risk analyses and technology reviews for 26 industries that emit major amounts of hazardous air pollution. Name: Factory Farm Exemptions Number: 1869 Clients: Sierra Club, Environmental Integrity Project, HSUS, Waterkeeper Alliance Summary: This case challenges an EPA rule that exempts factory farms from their obligation to notify government regulators when hazardous levels of toxic air emissions are released from animal waste. PUBLIC LANDS I. Protect National Forest Roadless Areas Name: Bush Roadless Repeal Number: 1408 Clients: TWS, Oregon Wild, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Northcoast Environmental Center, CBD, Defenders of Wildlife, HSUS, Sitka Conservation Society, Siskiyou Regional Education Project, Pacific Rivers Council, Forests Forever Foundation, California Wilderness Coalition, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Sierra Club, Idaho Conservation League, Conservation NW, Environmental Protection Information Center, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, Greenpeace, National Audubon Society Summary: This case challenges a rule that would undo protections against development and road building in currently-pristine areas of the National Forest System that were imposed by the Forest Service in 2001. Name: Wyoming Roadless & Wyoming Roadless II Number: 1205, 1206 Clients: Wyoming Outdoor Council, TWS, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, NRDC, National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife, Pacific Rivers Council, Sierra Club Summary: In these two matters, we are defending a 2001 rule limiting road building in still-undeveloped National Forest System lands against attack by industry seeking access to drill and log. Name: Smoky Canyon Mine Expansion Number: 1122 Clients: GYC, NRDC, Sierra Club, ID Conservation League, Defenders of Wildlife Summary: This case challenges the Forest Service and BLM's authorization of an expansion of the Smoky Canyon phosphate mine into two roadless areas in southeast Idaho-an expansion that will not only destroy pristine roadless lands, but also result in the discharge of toxic selenium that would threaten wildlife. Name: Idaho Roadless Rule Number: 1859 Clients: TWS, Lands Council, GYC Summary: This is a challenge to an Idaho-specific regulation governing 9.3 million acres of roadless National Forest areas in that state that weakens protections afforded by the national rule adopted by the Forest Service in 2001. Name: Sea Level Timber Sale (a.k.a. Orion North) Number: 1863 Clients: Tongass Conservation Society, Sierra Club, NRDC, CBD, Greenpeace, Cascadia Wildlands Summary: This is a challenge to a timber sale and new road proposed in an unspoiled area of the Tongass National Forest. Name: Tongass Roadless Exemption Number: 1346 Clients: NRDC, Sierra Club, The Boat Company, Alaska Wilderness Recreation & Tourism Association, Organized Village of Kake, Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Wrangell Resources Council, Greenpeace, Defenders of Wildlife, CBD, Tongass Conservation Society, Cascadia Wildlands Summary: This suit would overturn a 2003 loophole exempting the Tongass National Forest from the nationwide Roadless Area Conservation Rule.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIName: Juneau Access Project Number: 1316 Clients: Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Skagway Marine Access Committee, Lynn Canal Conservation, Alaska Public Interest Research Group, Sierra Club, NRDC Summary: This suit seeks to stop a road project in a still-pristine portion of the Tongass National forest near Berners Bay and the Lynn Canal. Name: SoCal Forest Plans Number: 1779 Client: CBD; Los Padres Forestwatch; Sierra Club; Defenders of Wildlife; California Native Plant Society; California Wilderness Coalition; TWS Summary: This case challenges the Forest Service's revision of forest plans for four national forests in southern California for failing to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. II. Restore Meaningful Ecosystem Protections And Public Participation In National Forest Management A. Restore Effective National Forest Planning Regulations Name: NFMA Regs 2008 Number: 1750 Clients: Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, TWS, Vermont Natural Resources Council Summary: This case challenges a renewed attempt in 2008 by the Forest Service to weaken the National Forest Management Act planning regulations by eliminating resource protection standards and reducing public involvement. Name: Appeals Reg Challenge Number: 1102 Clients: TWS, American Wildlands, Pacific River Council Summary: This is a challenge to regulations issued in 2003 that limit citizens' right to comment on and raise objections to Forest Service land management decisions. B. Preserve Ecosystem Protection In The Sierra Nevada Name: Sierra Framework Challenge Number: 1388 Clients: Sierra Forest Legacy, Sierra Club, TWS, CBD, NRDC Summary: This suit would overturn a Forest Service revision of land use plan requirements covering 11 million acres of California's Sierra Nevada that would undermine protections added to assure the survival of Sierra species imperiled by excessive logging and other development. Name: Sierra MIS Amendment Number: 1754 Clients: CBD, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Forest Legacy Summary: This case challenges a forest plan amendment that significantly weakens the requirements for monitoring the condition of key wildlife species chosen as indicators of ecosystem health. Name: CFA Framework Intervention Number: 1360 Clients: Sierra Forest Legacy, Sierra Club, TWS, NRDC, CBD Summary: In this case we are defending protections adopted by the Forest Service in 2001 that have been attacked by the timber industry. C. Preserve Protection Of Old-Growth Ecosystems In The Northwest Name: Owl Critical Habitat and Recovery Plan Number: 1633 (and #1646) Clients; Audubon Society of Portland, CBD, Conservation NW, Environmental Protection Information Center, National Center for Conservation Science and Policy, Oregon Wild, Seattle Audubon Society, Sierra Club, TWS, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Cascadia Wildlands, Klamath Forest Alliance, Conservation Congress, American Bird Conservancy, Umpqua Watersheds, Gifford-Pinchot Task Force Summary: These two cases challenge changes made in 2008 to the long-term plan for assuring the full recovery of the imperiled northern spotted owl, which depends on old-growth forests to survive, and to the area designated under the Endangered Species Act as "critical habitat" for the owl; both changes were made at the behest of the timber industry to remove limits on logging. Name: BLM WOPR Number: 1406 Clients: Environmental Protection Information Center, CBD, PCFFA, Cascadia Wildlands Project, Oregon Wild, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, TWS, Siskiyou Project; Institute for Fisheries Resources, Greenpeace, Coast Range Association, Umpqua Watersheds, Sierra Club Summary: This is a challenge to BLM's new plan for 2.5 million acres of forest in western Oregon that greatly increases the amount of logging. III. Curb ORV Abuses In Special Places And Defeat The Attempt To Create Locally-Controlled Highways Across Federal Lands A. Limiting Snowmobile Use In Yellowstone Name: YNP Snowmobiles 2007 Number: 1704 Clients: NRDC, TWS, GYC, Sierra Club Summary: In 2000, we intervened in an industry case challenging the Clinton administration decision to phase-out recreational snowmobiling in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. Name: YNP Snowmobiles 2008 Number: 1861 Clients: NRDC, Sierra Club, GYC, TWS, Winter Wildlands Alliance Summary: This case challenges the Park Service's rule allowing an increase in snowmobile use in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. B. Defeating County And State Archaic Road Claims On Federal Lands Name: Kane County Signage & RS 2477 Number: 1165 Clients: TWS, SUWA Summary: This is a challenge to ordinances and actions by a southern Utah county that purport to open routes across federal landsincluding a national monument and national park-- that were closed by federal land managers to protect natural values. Name: Kane County - Bald Knoll RS 2477 Number: 1842 Clients: TWS, Sierra Club Summary: In this case, we intervened in an action brought by a Utah county to claim ownership of various road routes in and around the federally-owned Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, for the purpose of opposing those claims. Name: Inyo County, CA 2477 Case Number: 1163 Clients: NCPA, California Wilderness Coalition, TWS, CBD, Friends of the Inyo, Sierra Club Summary: We intervened in this action brought by Inyo County claiming title to, and the right to open for ORV traffic, four routes within portions of Death Valley National Park designated as Wilderness. Name: Yosemite RS2477 Number: 1641 Clients: Sierra Club, TWS, NRDC Summary: This is an intervention on the side of the National Park Service to help defeat two purported rights-of-way claims within Yosemite National Park. Name: Canyonlands 2477 Intervention Number: 1146 Clients: TWS, Grand Canyon Trust; SUWA Summary: This intervention opposes county right-of-way claims, by Utah's San Juan County to a route within Canyonlands National Park Name: Deep Creek Mtns RS 2477 Number: 1151 Clients: TWS, Sierra Club; SUWA Summary: This case was brought by the State of Utah seeking title to three rights-of-way within the Deep Creek Mountains Wilderness Study Area, which is being considered for possible designation as Wilderness; we intervened to oppose the State's claims. Name: Grand Staircase Escalantae Number: 1162 Clients: Sierra Club, National Trust for Historic Preservation, TWS, SUWA Summary: This case was brought by two Utah counties to overturn restrictions on motorized vehicle use that were included in the federal management plan for the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument; we intervened to oppose those claims. Name: Jarbidge RS 2477 Intervention Number: 1164 Clients: TWS, Great Old Broads for Wilderness. Summary: This is a challenge to an agreement in which the Forest Service would recognize Elko County's ownership of a right-of-way across portions of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest in Nevada Name: Jarbidge - 2005 ROD Number: 1761 Clients: TWS, Great Old Broads for Wilderness Summary: This case challenges the Forest Service's 2005 decision to re-establish the Jarbidge South Canyon Road. C. Ensure That Travel Management Plans Reduce Harmful Off-Road Vehicle Use Name: Gallatin Travel Plan II Number: 1108 Clients: GYC, MT Wilderness Society, TWS, Wild West Institute Summary: This is a challenge to the Gallatin National Forest travel plan's provisions expanding ORV and snowmobile use within a congressionally-designated Wilderness Study Area near Yellowstone National Park. Name: Gallatin Winter Use Number: 2088 Clients: Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Montana Wilderness Association, TWS Summary: Earthjustice has joined this industry challenge to temporary limits on snowmobile use to help defend those limits. Name: Salmon-Challis Travel Plan Lawsuit Number: 1993 Clients: TWS, Idaho Conservation League Summary: This case challenges the Travel Management Plan for the Salmon-Challis National Forest in central Idaho for failure to protect still-pristine national forest land from by motorized vehicle damage. Name: Badger-Two Medicine Travel Plan Number: 1983 Clients: Montana Wilderness Association, TWS, Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance Summary: Earthjustice had intervened in this case to oppose motorized groups' challenge to Forest Service restrictions on off-road vehicle use in Badger-Two Medicine National Forest.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIIV. Ensure That National Monuments Are Managed To Protect Their Special Features Name: AZ Strip Plan Number: 1605 Clients: TWS, Sierra Club, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Grand Canyon Wildlands Council, AZ Wilderness Coalition Summary: This case challenges the resource management plan for the Vermilion Cliffs and Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monuments. Name: Missouri Breaks NM Number: 1167 Clients: Oil & Gas Accountability Project, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Friends of Missouri Breaks Monument, TWS Summary: This case would overturn approval of the management plan for the Upper Missouri Breaks National Monument for failure to protect the features for which the monument was established. Name: Sonoran Desert Amicus Number: 1906 Clients: Natural Resources Law Professors Summary: Earthjustice is participating in this case to urge that an Arizona district court reconsider its ruling that the Antiquities Act does not permit the President to impose management restrictions in national monuments. V. Other Public Lands Cases Name: University Lands II Number: 1350 Clients: Southeast Alaska Conservation Council; Tongass Conservation Society Summary: This is a constitutional challenge to an Alaska law that transferred 250,000 acres of state land to the University of Alaska for development. Name: Makua EIS Number: 1221 Clients: Malama Makua Summary: This case challenges the resumption of live fire training at Makua Military Reservation without an evaluation of the likely impacts. OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT I. Prevent Destructive Energy Development In Special Places In The Rockies Name: Utah RMP and Lease Sale Challenge Number: 1856 Clients: National Trust for Historic Preservation, Grand Canyon Trust, Center for Native Ecosystems, TWS, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Sierra Club, NPCA, Utah Rivers Council, Red Rock Forests Summary: These cases challenge changes to a land use plan and a related decision to lease lands for oil and gas development on lands adjacent to Arches and Canyonlands National Parks and Dinosaur National Monument in Utah. Name: Utah Wilderness Lease Intervention Number: 1936 Clients: SUWA, TWS, Grand Canyon Trust, National Parks Conservation Alliance, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Sierra Club, Utah Rivers Council, Red Rock Forests Summary: In this case, Earthjustice is opposing an oil industry attack on the BLM's decision to withdraw 77 illegally-issued oil and gas leases on wilderness-quality lands near Canyonlands National Park, Arches National Park, and Dinosaur National Monument. Name: Otero Mesa EIS Number: 1176 Clients; NM Wilderness Alliance, Southwest Environmental Center, NM Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, TWS, NRDC, NWF, WildEarth Guardians Summary: This case seeks to overturn BLM's decision in 2004 to expand oil and gas development on unspoiled public lands in New Mexico that would harm wildlife and water resources. Name: Roan Plateau Number: 1770 Clients: Sierra Club, CO Environmental Coalition, Center for Native Ecosystems, CO Mountain Club, NRDC, Rock the Earth, TWS, NWF, Trout Unlimited, Wilderness Workshop Summary: This is a challenge to BLM's revised management plan authorizing oil and gas development on Colorado's Roan Plateau. Name: Powder River Basin EIS Wyoming Number: 1181 Clients: Western Organization of Resource Councils, Wyoming Outdoor Council, NRDC, Powder River Basin Resource Council Summary: This case challenges the environmental impact statements prepared by the BLM on oil and gas development in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming. Name: South Shale Ridge CWP Lease Number: 1191 Clients: Sierra Club, Center for Native Ecosystems, Colorado Environmental Coalition, TWS, Colorado Mountain Club Summary: This case challenges oil and gas leasing of South Shale Ridge in citizen-proposed wilderness. Name: HD Mountains Roadless CBM Number: 0145 Clients: Colorado Environmental Coalition, Oil & Gas Accountability Project, San Juan's Citizen Alliance, TWS Summary: This suit challenges a joint decision by the Forest Service and BLM to permit coalbed methane development in and near the HD Mountains Roadless Area near Durango, Colorado. Name: White River NF Leasing Number: 1202 Clients: NRDC, Wilderness Workshop Summary: This case challenges Forest Service approval of the proposed Hells Gulch phase 2 natural gas project on National Forest lands important for wildlife and public recreation in Colorado. Name: Graham's Penstemon Number: 1654 Clients: Center for Native Ecosystems, SUWA, UT Native Plant Society, CO Native Plant Society Summary: This is a challenge to a FWS decision to withdraw its own proposal to extend Endangered Species Act protection to the imperiled Graham's penstemon, a rare wildflower threatened by energy development in Colorado and Utah. II. Reduce Adverse Impacts From Energy Development Where It Does Occur Name: Colorado Oil & Gas Rules Litigation Number: 1932 Clients: TWS, San Juan Citizens Alliance, Western Colorado Congress, Colorado Environmental Coalition Summary: We plan to intervene in an industry challenge to the protective oil and gas rules adopted by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. In 2008, we represented the conservation community in an extensive evidentiary rulemaking hearing before the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (#1769) that produced new rules imposing the most comprehensive protections of their kind in the country. The rules were ratified by the Colorado General Assembly in March 2009, and they took effect in April 2009. On May 1, 2009, the Colorado Oil and Gas Association filed suit to invalidate the rules. We intervened to defend the rules, and (together with the State of Colorado) we defeated a series of procedural motions by COGA. A schedule for briefing on the merits is expected to be set in the near future. Name: Amicus Brief in COGCC Standing Case Number: 1989 Clients: Grand Valley Citizens Alliance; Western Colorado Congress Summary: This case seeks to establish the right of surface owners and adjacent landowners to appeal drilling permits issued by the Colorado Oil and Gas Commission on their land. Name: COGCC Rulemaking Number: 1769 Clients: Western Slope Environmental Resource Council, Wilderness Workshop, The Wilderness Society, Colorado Environmental Coalition, High Country Citizens Alliance, Western Colorado Congress, Center for Native Ecosystems, Grand Valley Citizens Alliance, Colorado Mountain Club, Environment Colorado, Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action Summary: In this matter, we participated in an evidentiary rulemaking hearing before the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to set new rules governing oil and gas development in Colorado and intervened in an industry to challenge to the rules in order to defend the rules. Name: Oil & Gas NSPS/NESHAPS Review Number: 1781 Clients: Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action, San Juan Citizens Alliance Summary: This suit seeks to compel EPA to review national air pollution regulations for oil and gas production, a review required by the Clean Air Act no later than 1993. III. Ensure That Environmental Safeguards Are In Place For Gas Drilling In The Marcellus Shale Name: Ronco WWTP Number: 1996 Clients: Clean Water Action Summary: This regulatory appeal challenges a Consent Order and Agreement and a Water Quality Management Permit approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection for a new wastewater treatment plant to discharge contaminants from gas drilling into the Monongahela River. CLEAN WATER, AND ENOUGH OF IT I. Protect Regionally Significant Waters A. The Everglades, Lake Okeechobee, And Other Florida Waters Name: Everglades Number: 1473 Clients: NPCA, Defenders of Wildlife, NWF, FL Wildlife Federation, Audubon Society of the Everglades, Sierra Club; FL Chapter of Sierra Club Summary: This case seeks to restore the Everglades from the effects of industrial scale agriculture. Name: S-4 Backpump Number: 1487 & 1694 Clients: FL Wildlife Federation Summary: These cases seek to obtain regulation of toxic discharges pumped into Lake Okeechobee which cause toxic algae blooms in this drinking water supply. Name: EPA Water Transfer Rule Number: 1472 Clients: FL Wildlife Federation Summary: This is a challenge to an EPA Clean Water Act interpretive rule that lifts the Act's permit requirement for transfers of water between water bodies, even if the transferred water is polluted.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIName: Numeric Nutrient Standards Number: 1773 Clients: FL Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, Conservancy of SW FL, St. Johns Riverkeeper, Environmental Confederation of SW FL Summary: This is a Clean Water Act citizen's suit to force EPA to perform non-discretionary duty to promulgate numeric water quality standards for nutrients. Name: TMDL Challenge-Lake Okeechobee Tribs Number: 1492 Clients: FL Wildlife Federation, Environmental Conservation of SW FL, Save Our Creeks Summary: This is a challenge to inadequate limits set by EPA for phosphorous from animal waste and fertilizer added to tributaries of Florida's Lake Okeechobee. Name: Altman Phosphate Mine Number: 1785 Client: Sierra Club, ManaSota-88, People for Protecting the Peace River, Gulf Restoration Network, Environmental Confederation of SW FL Summary: This case seeks to overturn a permit authorizing the strip mining of a 2,300 acre tract of environmentally sensitive land and destruction of nearly 500 acres of high-quality wetlands in the headwaters of a tributary to the Peace River in Florida. Name: Everglades Open-Pit Lime Rock Mining Number: 1873 Clients: FL Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, local citizen Summary: This is a state law challenge to permit issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for a 7,600 acre lime rock mine in the Everglades Agricultural Area. Name: Altman Mine Due Process Challenge Number: 1891 Clients: Sierra Club, ManaSota-88, local landowners Summary: This case challenges a deal by which Manatee County agreed to rezone the site of a proposed phosphate strip mine from agricultural uses, in violation of prohibitions on ex parte contact and open meeting law requirements. Name: Altman Mine Rezoning Number: 1893 Clients: Sierra Club, ManaSota-88; local landowners Summary: This is a challenge to Manatee County's decision to rezone the Altman Tract from agricultural uses to phosphate strip mining. Name: Sludge Trespass Number: 1488 Client: Florida Citizens Summary: This lawsuit seeks to end the land application of sewage sludge, which floods downstream areas with polluted waters. Name: Flatford Swamp Trespass Number: 1475 Client: Crowley Museum & Nature Center, Inc. Summary: This case seeks to stop excessive groundwater withdrawals from wasteful agricultural practices that trigger seawater intrusion into Florida's freshwater aquifer. B. The Chesapeake And Anacostia Rivers Name: DC Non-Daily TMDLs Number: 1700 Clients: Friends of the Earth, Anacostia Riverkeeper, Potomoc Riverkeeper Summary: This is a challenge to EPAs approval of 15 pollution limit plans for various pollutants in D. C. waterways that are inadequate. Name: DC TSS TMDLs 2007 Number: 1712 Client: Friends of the Earth; Anacostia Riverkeeper Summary: This case challenges EPAs approval of an inadequate pollution limit for total suspended solids in the Anacostia River in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Name: Montgomery County MS4 Number: 1908 Clients: Anacostia Riverkeeper, Waterkeeper Alliance, Potomac Riverkeeper Summary: This case challenges the Maryland Department of Environment stormwater permit for Montgomery County, which fails to ensure compliance with water quality standards and pollution limits for the Anacostia and Potomac Rivers. Name: Combined Sewer Overflows Number: 1511 Clients: Kingman Park Civic Association, Anacostia Watershed Society, Friends of the Earth, American Canoe Association, Sierra Club Summary: This is a citizen suit against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority to stop the dumping of more than 4 billion gallons of sewage overflows into D.C. rivers each year. C. Puget Sound Name: Municipal Stormwater Number: 1440 Clients: People for Puget Sound, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance Summary: This suit challenges permits for rainwater runoff discharges by western Washington municipalities into Puget Sound that do not include adequate controls; pollution from runoff is the most serious water quality problem facing Puget Sound. Name: WSDOT Stormwater Permit Appeal Number: 1855 Clients: Puget Soundkeeper Alliance Summary: This is a challenge to a permit for stormwater discharges into Puget Sound from highways and other facilities controlled by the Washington State Department of Transportation that fails to include adequate controls. Name: Tidegates Number: 1464 Client: Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Summary: This case challenges the unpermitted replacement and operation of tidegates in the Skagit estuary that block upstream passage for ESA-listed salmon and degrade estuarine habitat. Name: FEMA Flood Insurance Number: 1420 Clients: NWF, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility Summary: This case seeks to ensure that FEMA's flood insurance program does not support flood plan developments in Puget Sound that is harmful to Chinook salmon. Name: Mason County Building Permit Number: 1980 Clients: Squaxin Island Tribe Summary: This case seeks to enforce a state law requiring that new developments demonstrate the existence of an adequate water supply in order to obtain a building permit, which the county failed to do. Name: Corps Levees Number: 1871 Clients: American Rivers Summary: This suit would compel the Army Corps of Engineers to comply with Endangered Species Act over implementation of levee maintenance and funding program that may impair habitat for listed salmon species. Name: Son of FEMA Number: 1938 Clients: NWF, Washington Wildlife Federation Summary: In this case, Earthjustice is challenging the Federal Emergency Management Agency's failure implement changes to flood insurance program needed to protect listed chinook salmon and orca whales from damaging floodplain development. Name: Clark County Agreed Order Number: 2026 Clients: Columbia Riverkeeper, Rosemere Neighborhood Association, Northwest Environmental Defense Center Summary: This case challenges an agreement between the Washington Department of Ecology and Clark County that authorizes a significant weakening of the existing stormwater pollution regulations for new development. D. Lake Tahoe Name: Keep Tahoe Blue Number: 1367 Clients: Sierra Club, League to Save Lake Tahoe Summary: This is a challenge to the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's Shorezone Ordinance Amendments, which would allow more new shoreline development to the detriment of Lake Tahoe's world-famous water quality. II. Restore Stream Flows A. Restore Hawaiian Stream Flows Name: Central Maui Streams Restoration Number: 1216 Clients: Maui Tomorrow, Hui o Na Wai 'Eha Summary: This is a contested administrative proceeding in which we seek to restore flows in four central Maui streams for the benefit of the stream and near shore marine ecosystems and the instream uses of the public, particularly Native Hawaiian cultural practitioners. Name: Na Wai 'Eha PUC Intervention Number: 1782 Clients: Hui o Na Wai 'Eha, Maui Tomorrow Summary: This case seeks to protect our clients' interests in ongoing litigation over the stream flows of Na Wai Eha in Central Maui, by intervening in proceedings before the Hawai'i Public Utilities Commission regarding the application of Wailuku Water Company for approval as a "utility" selling Na Wai Eha water for private profit. Name: 'Iao Aquifer GWMA Petition Number: 1208 Client: Maui Meadows Homeowners Association Summary: This petition seeks designation of the 'Iao & Waihe'e Aquifers as groundwater management areas, which leads to controls on water withdrawals. Name: Na Wai 'Eha Treatment Plant EIS Number: 2072 Clients: Hui o Na Wai 'Eha, Maui Tomorrow Summary: This case challenges the proposed Wai'ale Treatment Plant, which seeks to use Na Wai 'Eha stream flows for private land development and commercial sale. Summary: On June 21, 2010, we filed this case challenging the environmental impact statement for the proposed Wai'ale Treatment Plant, which seeks to use contested Na Wai 'Eha stream flows for private land development and sale to the public. Name: Waiahole Appeal 2 Number: 1229 Client: Ka Lahui Hawai'I, Hakipuu Ohana Summary: This is a contested administrative proceeding before the Hawaii Commission on Water Resources Management in which we seek to restore stream flows historically diverted by the Waiahole Ditch in Oahu; if restored; those flows would support stream life, traditional native Hawaiian uses such as growing taro, and estuarine productivity.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIName: Fat Law WUPA Number: 1961 Clients: Hakipuu Ohana, Makawai Stream Restoration Alliance Summary: In this administrative proceeding, Earthjustice objected to an application to divert more than 1 million gallons per day water from windward streams using the Wai'hole Ditch System. Name: Pila'a CWA Number: 1223 Clients: Limu Coalition, Kilauea Neighborhood Association Summary: This suit is a Clean Water Act enforcement action against sediment discharges by a private development on the north shore of Kauai that destroyed a formerly pristine reef and damaged several stream ecosystems. Name: Pila`a Public Records Number: 1224 Clients: Maui Tomorrow, Hui o Na Wai 'Eha Summary: This action was brought by the State of Hawaii to recover allegedly confidential documents that were provided to Earthjustice as public records under Hawaii state law. B. Washington Name: Muni Water Number: 1439 Clients: Center for Environmental Law & Policy, WA Environmental Council, Sierra Club, Puget Sound Harvesters, 3 junior water rights holders Summary: This is a challenge to the 2003 Washington State Municipal Water Law, which retroactively expands municipal and developer water rights at the expense of junior water rights holders and flows for fish. Name: Stockwater Exemption Number: 1927 Clients: Five Corners Family Farmers, Scott Collin, Center for Law & Policy, Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges the State of Washington's interpretation and application of Washington's exempt well statute, allowing unlimited use of groundwater (up to 500,000 gallons per day) for livestock watering for a 30,000 head feedlot in arid Franklin County, Washington C. San Pedro River Name: San Pedro Fort Huachuca BO Number: 1668 Clients: CBD, Maricopa Audubon Society Summary: This case challenges the Endangered Species Act consultation on Fort Huachuca's groundwater pumping and the impacts to listed species dependent on the San Pedro River. III. Other Water Cases Name: Flathead River Basin Number: 1707 Clients: NPCA, Yellowstone to Yukon, Flathead Coalition, Sierra Club of Canada, Wildsight, Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society, TWS, Headwaters Montana, Forest Ethics, Dogwood Initiative Summary: We have submitted petitions to the International Joint Commission and the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization concerning coal development threats in the Flathead River basin just north of the Canada-Montana border and Glacier National Park. Summary: Coal bed methane gas extraction and open-pit coal mining proposed for the Canadian headwaters of the transboundary Flathead River threaten to contaminate the river's pristine waters and fragment the Flathead's unique wildlife habitats, impacting not only the Canadian portion of the Flathead River basin, but also the US segments of the river and Glacier National Park. We petitioned the World Heritage Committee of UNESCO to designate Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park as a "World Heritage Site In Danger." In May 2009, we organized clients to pressure Canadian and US decision makers to encourage the World Heritage Committee review of the threats to Glacier National Park at their June 2009 annual session. 53,000 action alerts later, we succeeded. In June 2009, the World Heritage Committee voted unanimously to urge Canada not to proceed with energy development in British Columbia's Flathead valley without thorough environmental review. Several countries chastised Canada. The Committee also sent a fact-finding mission from the IUCN and World Heritage Centre to the Park and surrounding areas in September 2009. The mission's report, which makes recommendations to the Committee for its June 2010 meeting, recommends listing Waterton-Glacier on the List in Danger if mining proposals move forward to the application stage. On February 9, 2010 the British Columbia government passed legislation prohibiting mining in the Flathead Watershed Area. Name: Idaho NPDES Renewal Number: 1955 Clients: Idaho Conservation League Summary: This case will challenge EPA's systematic failure to renew expired NPDES permits in Idaho. Summary: EPA still manages the Clean Water Act discharge permitting program (NPDES) in Idaho. It has, however, systematically failed to renew expired permits to ensure that the pollution discharges conform to the current and often upgraded water quality standards. Currently, over half of the NPDES permits in Idaho have expired, some many years ago. We are currently discussing settlement possibilities with EPA, and anticipate that we will be able to settle this case in the next 60 to 90 days. If settlement fails, we may need to pursue an unreasonable delay lawsuit in order to correct this situation and protect Idaho's waters. WILDLIFE I. Protect Keystone Species In The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem A. Grizzly Bears Name: Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Delisting Number: 1134 Clients: NRDC, Sierra Club, W. Watersheds Project, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, CBD, Great Bear Foundation, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Greater Yellowstone Coalition Summary: This case challenges a 2007 decision to remove Yellowstone grizzly bears from the list of species safeguarded by the ESA, thereby eliminating the restrictions on habitat destruction and other protections necessary for Yellowstone grizzlies to survive. Name: Rock Creek Mine 2 Number: 1739 Clients: Rock Creek Alliance, NRDC, Cabinet Resource Group, MT Wilderness Society, Earthworks, Sierra Club, Trout Unlimited, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Pacific Rivers Council, Great Old Broads for Wilderness Summary: This case challenges the FWSs renewed approval of the Rock Creek Mine project in Montana's Cabinet Mountains, which would result in the loss of about 7,000 acres of listed grizzly bear habitat and dump millions of gallons of waste water into the Clark Fork River, which is home to an ESA-listed population of bull trout. B. Wolves Name: Wolf Delisting II Number: 1850 Clients: NRDC, CBD, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Clearwater, Sierra Club, Hells Canyon Preservation Council, Cascadia Wildlands Project, OR Wild, Wildlands Project, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, W. Watersheds Project; HSUS, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance Summary: This case challenges the FWS's renewed efforts to delist wolves in the Northern Rockies. Name: Gray Wolf Delisting and 10(j) Lawsuits Number: 1128 & 1721 Clients: Defenders of Wildlife, NRDC, Sierra Club, CBD, HSUS, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Friends of the Clearwater, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands Project, Western Watersheds Project, Wildlands Project Summary: These two cases seek to set aside two FWS rules that would permit extensive killing of gray wolves in the Northern Rockies: 1) the premature and unwarranted decision to strip wolves of ESA protection; and 2) modifications to other ESA provisions that would allow states to kill wolves deemed to cause "unacceptable impacts" to the wild ungulate populations on which they feed. C. Bison Name: Horse Butte Intervention Number: 1792 Clients: GYC, NRDC, Horse Butte landowners Summary: We intervened in this action to oppose claims by Montana stockmen that the State of Montana should haze, capture, or kill Yellowstone National Park bison that cross the western park boundary in search of spring forage on adjacent national forest lands. D. Elk Name: Wyoming Elk Feedgrounds Number: 1131 Clients: Wyoming Outdoor Council, W. Watersheds Project, GYC, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance Summary: This case challenges USFS and BLM Failure to evaluate the consequences before permitting the State of Wyoming to operate winter elk feedgrounds on federal land. Name: National Elk Refuge Number: 1693 Clients: Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Defenders of Wildlife Summary: This case challenges the Jackson Hole National Elk Refuge's new elk and bison management plan, which perpetuates winter feeding that, causes high disease levels among the fed animals. E. Wolverines Name: Wolverine III Number: 1793 Clients: Defenders of Wildlife, CBD, Conservation NW, Friends of the Clearwater, GYC, ID Conservation League, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Wyoming Outdoor Council Summary: This case challenges the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's March, 2008 decision not to extend ESA protection to the wolverine population in the lower-48 states as a threatened or endangered species.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIF. Grayling Name: Grayling Listing Number: 1897 Clients: CBD, Western Watersheds Project, Federation of Fly Fishers Summary: This case challenges the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's refusal to list the only surviving population of fluvial Arctic grayling in the contiguous United States under the Endangered Species Act, despite threats to the species posed by global warming. G. Lynx Name: Lynx critical habitat intervention Number: 1959 Clients: Defenders of Wildlife, Lands Council, Friends of the Wild Swan, CBD, Conservation NW Summary: This Intervention seeks to defend the FWS's designation of critical habitat for the ESA-listed Canada lynx against legal challenge filed by two snowmobile advocacy groups. II. Eliminate Key Threats To The Survival And Recovery Of Imperiled Pacific Salmon Populations A. Sacramento River To San Francisco Bay Name: Salmon OCAP BiOp Number: 1382 Clients: Winnemem Wintu Tribe, The Bay Institute, CA Trout, DeltaKeeper, Sacramento River Preservation Trust, Friends of the River, NRDC, N. CA Council, Federation of Fly Fishers, PCFFA Summary: This case challenges a finding that planned increases of Water pumping from the Bay-Delta will not jeopardize five listed salmonid species. Name: Salmon BiOp Intervention Number: 1962 Clients: PCFFA, Institute for Fisheries Resources, The Bay Institute, California Trout, Friends of the River, NRDC, N. CA Council of the Federation of Fly Fishers, San Francisco Baykeeper, Sacramento River Preservation Trust, Winnemem Wintu Tribe Summary: This series of lawsuits was brought by agricultural interests to set aside mitigation measures for the operation of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project designed to protect endangered California salmon, steelhead, green sturgeon and Southern resident orcas; Earthjustice is opposing those claims. Name: Delta Smelt BiOp Number: 1362 Clients: Natural Resources Defense Council; California Trout; Baykeeper and its Deltakeeper Chapter; Friends of the River; and The Bay Institute Summary: This case challenges Fish and Wildlife Service's erroneous finding that planned increases of water pumping from the Bay-Delta would not jeopardize the Delta Smelt. Name: Delta Smelt Intervention Number: 1921 Clients: NRDC, The Bay Institute Summary: We intervened in this case on the side of federal agencies to defend restrictions on how much water can be exported from the Bay Delta which were imposed to protect the delta smelt, a freshwater fish listed under the ESA as "threatened." Name: Upper Columbia Steelhead Number: 1466 Clients: Pacific Rivers Council, Trout Unlimited, Sierra Club, Native Fish Society, Wild Steelhead Coalition, American Rivers, Federation of Fly Fishers, American Rivers, Columbia Riverkeeper Summary: Challenge to the downlisting of Upper Columbia Steelhead from endangered to threatened based on numbers of hatchery fish Name: Modesto Steelhead Intervention Number: 1438 Clients: N. CA Council of Federation of Fly Fishers, Federation of Fly Fishers, Delta Fly Fishers, Trout Unlimited, CBD Summary: We intervened in a challenge to the protection of steelhead in central California to defend those protections. Name: CA Steelhead Intervention Number: 1409 Clients: N. CA Council of Federation of Fly Fishers, Trout Unlimited, Federation of Fly Fishers Summary: We intervened to defend ESA listings and protections for five populations of steelhead in California. B. Columbia-Snake Hydropower System Name: FCRPS BiOp Number: 1404 Clients: NWF, ID Wildlife Federation, NW Sportfishing Industry Association, Institute for Fisheries Resources, WA Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, ID Steelhead & Salmon Unlimited, Salmon for All, Trout Unlimited, ID Rivers United, American Rivers, Federation of Fly Fishers, NW Energy Coalition, Columbia Riverkeeper, PCFFA Summary: This case challenges the succession of biological opinions governing the Columbia-Snake River hydropower system in order to ensure the survival recovery of listed salmon and steelhead. Name: Upper Snake BiOp Challenge Number: 1467 Clients: American Rivers, Institute for Fisheries Resources, ID Rivers United, NWF, PCFFA Summary: This case challenges NOAA Fisheries' Biological Opinion for Bureau of Reclamation Projects in the Upper Snake River in order to ensure the survival and recovery of listed salmon and steelhead. Name: BPA 9th Circuit FCRPS BiOp Challenge Number: 1844 Clients: American Rivers, PCFFA, Sierra Club, Salmon For All, Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association, ID Rivers United, ID Wildlife Federation, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Federation of Fly Fishers Summary: This case challenges the Bonneville Power Administration's operation of the dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers due to harm to listed salmon and steelhead. Name: WA Dissolved Gas Waiver Standard Number: 2007 Clients: American Rivers, NW Sportfishing Industry Association, Association of NW Steelheaders, ID Rivers United, PCFFA, Institute for Fisheries Resources Summary: This case involves a challenge to a Washington State water quality standard that harms the prospects of salmon survival by limiting spills of water over dams intended to allow fish to avoid generating turbines. C. Klamath River Flows Name: Klamath Takings Intervention Number: 1435 Clients: Northcoast Environmental Center, OR Wild, Institute for Fisheries Resources, PCFFA, Klamath Forest Alliance, WaterWatch of OR, TWS, Sierra Club Summary: In this case, we intervened to oppose claims by Klamath Basin irrigators that they are entitled to compensation from the public as a result of flow measures adopted to protect endangered salmon. D. Pesticides And Salmon Name: Salmon Pesticides Delay: Number: 1441 Clients; NW Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides, Institute for Fisheries Resources, PCFFA Summary: This suit is against NMFS for failing to complete the consultation process mandated under the Endangered Species Act in connection with EPA's decisions on the registration of pesticides that can harm salmon and steelhead. E. Other Salmon Litigation Name: Coho ITP Number: 1918 Clients: Klamath Riverkeeper, Quartz Valley Indian Reservation, PCFFA, Environmental Protection Information Center, Sierra Club, Northcoast Environmental Center, Institute for Fisheries Resources Summary: This case challenges the California Department of Fish and Game's decision to authorize the killing of threatened coho salmon by agricultural activities in the Shasta and Scott River watersheds. III. Flows for Grand Canyon Fish Name: Glen Canyon Flows Number: 1715 Client: Grand Canyon Trust Summary: This is a challenge to the operation of Glen Canyon Dam in violation of conditions set by FWS requiring the release of seasonal, steady flows to protect habitat for the endangered humpback chub. IV. Sierra Nevada Wildlife Name: Pika CESA Number: 1748 Client: CBD Summary: This case challenges the California Fish and Game Commission's unwarranted rejection of a petition to list the American pika under the California Endangered Species Act. Name: Pika CESA II Number: 1985 Clients: CBD Summary: This case challenges the California Fish and Game Commission's unwarranted decision that there is insufficient information to indicate that listing the American pika under the California Endangered Species Act may be warranted. Name: Fisher II Number: 1365 Clients: NRDC, Sierra Club, CBD Summary: In this case, we intervened to defend an FWS determination that Endangered Species Act protections for the Pacific fisher, a key Sierra Nevada species decimated by excessive logging, may be warranted against attack by the timber industry. Name: Fisher Warranted but Precluded Number: 2038 Clients: CBD, Sierra Forest Legacy, Environmental Protection Information Center, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center Summary: This case seeks to prompt FWS to take action to list the pacific fisher; a species FWS admits deserves listing under the Endangered Species Act, but claims cannot be listed due to more urgent listing priorities. V. Hawaiian Birds Name: Kauai Seabirds ESA Take - KIUC Number: 1219 Clients: American Bird Conservancy, CBD, Hui Ho'omalu I Ka 'Aina, Conservation Council for Hawai'i Summary: This is an enforcement action to end the unauthorized harm to endangered and threatened sea birds by power lines and associated structures owned and operated by Kauai Island Utility Cooperative.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIName: Palila IV Number: 1784 Clients: Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Hawaii Audubon Society Summary: This litigation aims to insure that the State of Hawai'i complies with court orders requiring the complete and permanent eradication of sheep that destroy food, shelter and breeding grounds for the critically endangered palila. Name: Princeville Resort ESA Take Number: 2034 Clients: Conservation Council for Hawai'i, CBD, American Bird Conservancy, Hui Ho'omalu I Ka 'Aina Summary: This case seeks to force the Princeville Resort to reduce the injury and death to imperiled sea birds resulting from bright outdoor lighting. VI. Other Wildlife Litigation Name: Mountain Plover I Number: 1170 Clients: Wildlife Guardians, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance Summary: This case challenges the FWS's decision to withdraw the proposed rule to list the Mountain Plover as a threatened species OCEANS I. Reduce Bycatch And Overfishing A. Gulf Of Mexico Name: Gulf Longlines & Sea Turtles 2 Number: 2002 Clients: Gulf Restoration Network Summary: This case challenges the failure of the National Marine Fishries Service to insure that the survival of threatened and endangered sea turtles is not jeopardized by the Bottom Longline Fishery in the Gulf of Mexico. Name: Gulf of Mexico Aquaculture Number: 1900 Clients: Gulf Restoration Network; Food & Water Watch Summary: This lawsuit would require NOAA Fisheries to act on a plan to allow offshore aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico; by its inaction, the agency has allowed the proposed plan to go into effect without development of national policies and regulations to regulate aquaculture. B. New England Name: New England Groundfish Closed Area Petition Number: 1731 Clients: Midcoast Fishermen's Association; Curt Rice Summary: This case challenges the Secretary of Commerce's failure to exclude certain trawl ships from fishing within areas that have been closed to other fishing in order to protect groundfish spawning grounds. Name: New England Herring Fishery Observer Video Number: 2009 Clients: Patrick Paquette, Massachusetts Striped Bass Association & Recreational Fisheries Alliance Summary: This case challenges the refusal of the National Marine Fisheries Service to release video taken by federal observers aboard New England herring midwater trawl vessels showing how monitoring activity is conducted. Name: New England Herring Fishery Closed Area 1 Access Rule Number: 2011 Clients: Peter Taylor, Stuart Tolley, Bob St. Pierre, Cape Cod Commercial Hook Fishermen's Association Summary: This case challenges revisions to the rules that allow industrial herring midwater trawl fishing vessels to fish in an area designated to protect groundfish stocks, without monitoring the resulting harm to groundfish. C. Mid-Pacific Name: False Killer Whales Take Reduction Plan Number: 1901 Clients: CBD, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Hui Malama I Kohola Summary: This case challenges the NMFS's failure to develop a plan to reduce deaths of Hawaii's false killer whales, a species protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, caused by the Hawai'i-based longline fishing fleet. Name: Swordfish Longlines Number: 1933 Clients: Turtle Island Restoration Network, CBD, KAHEA Summary: This case seeks to invalidate changes to the federal fishery management plan for the Hawai'i-based swordfish longline fishery that would increase the incidental killing of protected sea turtles, albatross, and marine mammals. II. Marine Mammal Protection Name: Okinawa Dugong Number: 1272 Clients: CBD, Sea Turtle Restoration Project, Japan Environmental Lawyers Federation, Save the Dugong Foundation, individually named plaintiffs. Summary: This case challenges the Defense Department's involvement in a construction project in Okinawa that would destroy the last remaining habitat of the endangered Okinawan Dugong. Name: Naval Undersea Warfare Training Range Number: 1973 Clients: Florida Wildlife Federation, Ocean Mammal Institute, Animal Welfare Institute Summary: Challenge to the construction and operation of the Navy's Undersea Warfare Training Range, which would frequently use very loud levels of underwater sound year-round near calving grounds for the endangered right whale. III. Protect The Arctic From Oil Development Name: Shell OCS Exploration 2007 Number: 1337 Clients: CBD, REDOIL, Pacific Environment, AK Wilderness League, NRDC. Sierra Club Summary: This is a challenge to the Minerals Management Service's approval of an oil company plan to conduct exploratory drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf in the Beaufort Sea, including in areas off the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Name: Chukchi OCS Lease Sale 193 Number: 1307 Clients: AK Wilderness League, National Audubon Society, Native Village of Point Hope, REDOIL, Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, City of Point Hope, N. AK Environmental Center, CBD, TWS, Pacific Environment, Oceana, NRDC, Defenders of Wildlife, World Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges Lease Sale 193, in which the Minerals Management Service leased nearly 30 million acres of the Chukchi Sea outer continental shelf for oil and gas exploration and development. Name: Shell Beaufort Sea OCS Exploration 2010 Number: 1939 Clients: Native Village of Point Hope, AK Wilderness League, CBD, Defenders of Wildlife, NRDC, N. AK Environmental Center, Oceana, Pacific Environment, REDOIL, Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges a decision by the U.S. Minerals Management Service to authorize Shell Offshore, Inc. to conduct exploration drilling in the Beaufort Sea. Name: Shell Chukchi Sea OCS Exploration Plan 2010 Number: 2018 Clients: Native Village of Point Hope, AK Wilderness League, CBD, Defenders of Wildlife, National Audubon Society, NRDC, N. AK Environmental Center, Oceana, Ocean Conservancy, Pacific Environment, REDOIL, Sierra Club, TWS Summary: This case challenges a decision by the U.S. Minerals Management Service to authorize Shell Gulf of Mexico, Inc. to conduct exploration drilling in the Chukchi Sea on leases issued as part of the illegal Lease Sale 193. Name: Shell Chukchi Clean Air Act Permit 2010 Number: 2019 Clients: NRDC, Native Village of Point Hope, REDOIL, AK Wilderness League, Audubon Alaska, CBD, N. AK Environmental Center, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Sierra Club Summary: This is an administrative challenge to EPA's approval of a Clean Air Act permit for polluting oil and gas exploration activities in the Chukchi Sea by Shell. Name: Shell Beaufort Clean Air Act Permit 2010 Number: 2020 Clients: NRDC, Native Village of Point Hope, REDOIL, AK Wilderness League, Audubon Alaska, CBD, N. AK Environmental Center, Oceana, Pacific Environment, Sierra Club Summary: In this case, Earthjustice is challenging a Clean Air Act permit issued by EPA covering Shell's multi-year program of offshore exploratory oil and gas drilling in the Beaufort Sea. Name: Polar Bear Take Regulation Number: 1333 Clients: Pacific Environment, CBD Summary: This is a challenge to regulations authorizing the killing of polar bears and Pacific walrus otherwise protected by the ESA and Marine Mammal Protection Act during year-round oil and gas activities in and around the Beaufort Sea. IV. Gulf Oil Spill Name: Gulf of Mexico Oil Drilling Number: 2066 Clients: Sierra Club, Gulf Restoration Network Summary: This case challenges a decision by the U.S. Minerals Management Service to waive requirements insuring that all Gulf exploratory drilling plans consider the possibility of a blowout and provide an adequate response to the potential discharge from that blowout. Name: Offshore Drilling Exploratory Plans Number: 2075 Clients: Gulf Restoration Network; Sierra Club Summary: This set of cases challenges decisions approving offshore exploratory drilling in the Gulf for the failure to perform the requisite environmental analysis and the absence of a blowout scenario or analysis of preparedness for a worst-case oil spill. Name: BP Oil Response Plan Number: 2074 Clients: Gulf Restoration Network; Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges the U.S. Mineral Management Services approval of BP's inadequate oil spill response plan for the Deepwater Horizon and other drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico. Name: Deepwater Moratorium Intervention Number: 2082 Clients: Florida Wildlife Federation; Sierra Club Summary: Earthjustice is participating in this lawsuit to oppose efforts to judicially overturn the six-month moratorium on deepwater offshore drilling imposed by the Obama administration on risky deepwater oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part IIIENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH I. Reduce The Human Health Impacts Of Pesticides Name: Farmworkers Poison I Number: 1419 Client: UFW; Sea Mar Community Health Center, PCUN, Beyond Pesticides, Frente Indigena Oaxaquena Binacional Summary: This case challenges EPA's continued authorization of two pesticides--AZM and Phosmet--that poison farmworkers. Name: Farmworkers Poison II Number: 1634 Client: Teamsters Local 890, UFW, Sea Mar Community Health Center, PCUN, Beyond Pesticides, Frente Indigena de Organizaciones Binacionales, Farm Labor Organizing Comm., PANNA Summary: This case challenges EPA's decision to allow continued use of chlorpyrifos, an organophosphate pesticide that poisons farmworkers, children, and wildlife. Name: Endosulfan Number: 1718 Clients: PANNA, UFW, NRDC, Teamsters Local 890, PCUN, Center for Environmental Health, Farm Labor Organizing Committee, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Beyond Pesticides Summary: This case challenges EPA's re-registration decision allowing continued use of the pesticide endosulfan that poisons children, bystanders, ecosystems, and wildlife. Name: Diazinon Number: 1719 Clients: UFW, PCUN, Beyond Pesticides, PANNA, Teamsters Local 890, Farm Labor Organizing Committee Summary: This case will challenge EPA's re-registration of the pesticide diazinon that poisons workers and children, contaminates streams, and kills fish and other wildlife. Name: 4 OPs Number: 1720 Clients: UFW, Sea Mar Community Health Center, Beyond Pesticides, NRDC, PCUN, PANNA, Teamsters Local 890, Farm Labor Organizing Committee Summary: This case challenges EPA's re-registration decision allowing continued use of four organophosphate pesticides that poison farmworkers, children in rural areas, and wildlife. Name: Pesticide Testing on Humans Number: 1452 Clients: PCUN, San Francisco Bay Area Physicians for Social Responsibility, PANNA Summary: This suit challenges an EPA rule governing how pesticides may be tested on humans that does not incorporate the legally-required recommendations of the Nuremburg Code and a comprehensive National Academy of Sciences study. Name: Apple Moth Number: 1776 Clients: Our Children's Earth Foundation; Mothers Of Marin Against The Spray; Stop The Spray East Bay; City Of Albany; City Of Berkeley; City Of Richmond; Center For Environmental Health; Californians For Pesticide Reform; Pesticide Watch Education Fund; Pesticide Action Network North America; Citizens For East Shore Parks; Stop The Spray San Francisco Summary: This case challenges an aerial spray program proposed by the California Department of Food and Agriculture to eradicate the light brown apple moth throughout the Bay Area, despite unanswered questions about the effects on humans, pets and the environment. II. Protect People From Toxics Name: Cleaning Product Chemical Reporting Number: 1813 Clients: Citizens' Environmental Coalition, Clean NY, Learning Disabilities Association of NY State, Sierra Club, Environmental Advocates of NY, NY Public Interest Research Group, Riverkeeper Summary: This case seeks to force manufacturers of household cleaning products to publicly disclose the constituent chemical ingredients and research results concerning the effects of these chemicals on human health and the environment. III. Protect People From Toxic Waste Name: Hazardous Waste Gasification Number: 1768 Clients: Sierra Club, Environmental Integrity Project Summary: This case challenges an EPA rule allowing refineries to burn hazardous waste without meeting federal requirements for storing, transporting and disposing of them. Name: Comparable Fuels Number: 1510 Clients: Sierra Club, NRDC Summary: This suit seeks to overturn EPA regulations that do not require sources burning hazardous waste to implement pollution prevention measures and allow some dangerous wastes to be burned in facilities that are not subject to hazardous waste combustion regulations. Name: Comparable Fuels Number: 1907 Clients: Sierra Club; Louisiana Environmental Action Network Summary: This case challenges an EPA rule allowing more than 100,000 tons per year of hazardous waste to be burned in ordinary industrial boilers without meeting storage, transportation, or emission standards that would otherwise apply. Name: Definition of Solid Waste Rule Number: 1837 Clients: Sierra Club Summary: This case challenges EPA's decision to exempt certain hazardous wastes from special storage, transportation, and disposal requirements that normally apply to such wastes. Name: CERCLA 108(b) Number: 1675 Clients: Sierra Club, Amigos Bravos, Great Basin Resource Watch, ID Conservation League Summary: This case seeks to remedy EPA's failure to require companies handling hazardous substances to post bonds or show they can afford to pay for potential clean-up costs in the event of a spill rather than leave the public to foot the bill. Name: Brookfield Landfill Number: 1788 Client: Northern Great Kills Civic Association Summary: This lawsuit seeks to force New York City to implement a long-delayed plan to clean up hazardous waste at Staten Island's Brookfield Landfill, which currently discharges toxic leachate into the surrounding residential community. IV. Genetic Engineering Name: Genetically Engineered Sugar Beets Number: 1723 Clients: Center for Food Safety, Sierra Club, Organic Seed Alliance, High Mowing Organic Seeds Summary: This case challenges the federal government's failure to assess the environmental consequences of deregulating sugar beets genetically engineered to permit the application of more toxic herbicides to agricultural fields. V. Other Health Cases Name: Honolulu Irradiator NEPA Number: 1218 Client: Concerned Citizens of Honolulu Summary: This case challenges the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's failure to conduct an environmental analysis of a proposed nuclear food irradiator at Honolulu International Airport. OTHER CASES Name: FTAA FOIA Number: 1252 Clients: Center for International Environmental Law Summary: This case seeks public disclosure of documents reflecting positions taken by the U.S. government in negotiations with other countries over trade agreements whose provisions affect public health and the environment. Name: Turtle Bay Amicus Brief Number: 1979 Clients: Conservation Council for Hawai`i, Maui Tomorrow, Surfrider Foundation, Hawaii's Thousand Friends Summary: Earthjustice is participating in this case to establish that, under Hawai'i state law, environmental reviews for development projects may need to be supplemented updated based on changes in surrounding circumstances, whether or not the proposed development itself changes.Case Summaries Continued
Form 990, Part III0145 HD Mountains Roadless CBM Dev 1,410.65 0543 Medicine Lake Geothermal 31,560.00 0573 Ballast Water Exemption 113,485.82 1102 Appeals Reg Challenge 1,032.03 1122 Smoky Canyon Mine Expansion 5,341.20 1131 Wyoming Elk Feedgrounds 389.33 1132 Wyoming Roadless 514.47 1134 Yellowstone Grizzly Delisting 557.52 1151 Deep Creek Mtns RS 2477 13,033.31 1152 Desert Rock Power Plant 396.53 1162 GSENM Plan Intervention 246.80 1163 Inyo County, CA 2477 Case 1,480.80 1164 Jarbidge RS 2477 Intervention 1,016.92 1167 Missouri Breaks NM 1,003.68 1170 Mountain Plover I 62,500.00 1194 Sunflower Coal Plant Air Permit 43.35 1206 Wyoming Roadless 2 1,341.92 1219 Kaua'i Seabirds ESA Take 5,107.10 1221 Makua EIS 10,053.69 1307 Chukchi OCS Lease Sale 193,757.79 1317 Kensington 2 5,358.70 1337 Shell OCS Exploration 2007 174,826.55 1350 University Lands II 147,502.67 1367 Keep Tahoe Blue 1,031.09 1373 National PM Standards 202,837.20 1374 NFMA Planning Regulations 300,498.40 1378 PM-10 Attainment Finding 10.11 1382 Salmon OCAP Biop 9,974.76 1388 Sierra Framework Challenge 3,314.24 1396 Vallejo CWA 3,537.35 1404 1999 Hydro ESA 4,520.91 1406 BLM WOPR 11,197.16 1408 Bush Roadless Repeal 486,900.63 1435 Klamath Takings Intervention 1,175.37 1438 Modesto Intervention I & II 817.60 1439 Muni Water 170.68 1440 Municipal Stormwater 43.60 1464 Tidegates 42.43 1473 Everglades 619.63 1475 Flatford Swamp Trespass 114,143.12 1499 Boilers NSPS 93,445.07 1502 CAA Fine Particle Designations 5.58 1506 Cement Kilns III 41.48 1515 Dry Cleaners 1,404.81 1521 Hazardous Waste Combustors II 51.51 1544 OSWI 26.63 1548 Ozone Phase 2 197,490.78 1552 Power Plant Air Toxics 124,397.66 1554 SSM Plans & Reconsideration 1,130.19 1557 Sufficiency Monitoring Rule 67,587.80 1624 Murrelet Delist Intervention 82.67 1629 Navy USWEX Sonar 25,000.00 1633 Owl Recovery Plan 234.75 1641 Yosemite RS2477 94.12 1654 Graham's Penstemon 925.24 1668 San Pedro Fort Huachuca BO 161.04 1672 ISR Intervention 129.39 1675 CERCLA 108(b) 115,521.49 1679 White Pine Coal Plant 373.27 1693 National Elk Refuge 135.21 1698 Brick Kilns Deadline 350.20 1700 DC Non-Daily TMDLs 137.26 1702 Dry Fork Coal-Fired Power Plant 1,358.95 1703 Sunflower RUS NEPA 5,040.78 1704 Yellowstone National Park Snowmobiles 2007 175,805.14 1711 West Elk Coal Methane Drilling 2,197.71 1712 DC TSS TMDLs 228.62 1713 PVC Deadline Case 7,587.64 1715 Glen Canyon Flows 759.25 1716 Distribution Transformers 51.79 1721 Gray Wolf 10(j) 24.50 1723 Genetically Eng Sugar Beets 11,542.76 1730 Furnaces & Boilers 88.09 1739 Rock Creek Mine 2 1,483.03 1750 NFMA Regs 2008 48.29 1754 Sierra MIS Amendment 1,205.33 1761 Jarbidge - 2005 ROD 418.24 1768 Hazardous Waste Gasification 485.42 1769 COGCC Rulemaking 184.72 1770 Roan Plateau 4,448.25 1773 Numeric Nutrient Standards 199,816.52 1778 TMDL II 623.04 1779 SoCal Forest Plans 1,019.36 1780 Ozone Standards 57.82 1781 Oil and Gas NSPS/NESHAPS Review 15,510.07 1784 Palila IV 382.76 1785 Altman Phosphate Mine 162.69 1789 Kaua'i Seabirds ESA Take CoK 113.43 1791 PM2.5 NSR Rule 654.28 1792 Horse Butte Intervention 316.63 1798 Highwood CO2 50.48 1802 Chevron CEQA 3,644.85 1810 CEC Carlsbad PP Intervention 4,490.54 1836 Seminole Coal Plant 20,744.74 1842 Kane County - Bald Knoll RS 2477 2,034.99 1843 Highwood Remand 309.28 1844 BPA Ninth Circuit FCRPS BiOp Challenge 19.84 1850 Wolf Delisting II 1,964.43 1851 ESA Consultation Rule Change 355.26 1852 Power Plants Deadline 9.33 1854 2008 Deadlines 1,268.10 1855 WSDOT Stormwater Permit Appeal 258.06 1856 Utah RMP and Lease Sale Challenge 386.24 1859 Idaho Roadless Rule 2,410.53 1861 YNP Snowmobiles 2008 1,561.17 1862 Stream Buffer Zone Rule 750.07 1863 Sea Level Timber Sale 2,148.44 1864 Oil Shale - Resource Management Plans 466.08 1865 Oil Shale - Regulations 390.73 1866 Centralia Coal Plant 2,131.66 1871 Corps Levees 24.78 1875 Gulf Longlines & Sea Turtles 966.24 1881 Highwood Construction 208.07 1884 Alberta Clipper Pipeline 15,051.42 1891 Altman Mine Due Process Challe 778.91 1893 Altman Mine Rezoning 3,561.96 1897 Grayling Listing 18,950.38 1901 False Killer Whales Take Reduc 1,450.50 1907 Comparable Fuels II 478.44 1908 Montgomery County MS4 556.52 1916 GHG Reporting Rule 1,763.50 1918 Coho ITP 776.85 1921 Delta Smelt Intervention 1,243.72 1922 EPAct WWEC 828.62 1927 Groundwater permitting stock-w 2,628.10 1932 COOil and Gas Rules Litigation 1,344.27 1933 Swordfish Longlines 304.25 1936 Utah Wilderness Lease Interven 141.16 1939 Shell OCS Exploration Pln 2010 5,125.00 1944 Sunflower Air Permit 201.39 1955 Idaho NPDES Renewal 95.28 1959 Lynx critical habitat interven 424.34 1962 Salmon BiOp Intervention 1,805.00 1976 HI Clean Energy Planning Frame 321.97 1983 Badger-Two Medicine Travel Pla 932.13 1984 Smog Reduction Plan 456.48 1985 Pika CESA II 669.92 1989 Amicus Brief in COGCC Standing 173.22 1993 Salmon-Challis Travel Plan 1,580.26 1994 Sierra MIS Appeal 38.43 1998 Coal Prep Plant NSPS 549.27 2002 Gulf Longlines & Sea Turtles 2 380.11 2005 Hawaii Feed-In Tariffs 298.48 2019 Shell Chukchi Sea 2010 Clean A 805.95 2020 Shell Beaufort Sea 2010 Clean 2,000.00 2021 SSM Interventions 21.98 2026 Clark County Agreed Order 245.55 2031 Clark County Enforcement Actio 87.61 2033 GHG Endangerment Finding 61.80 2034 Princeville Resort ESA Take 50.29 2038 Fisher Warranted but Precluded 129.63 TOTAL 2,893,042.97Schedule of Court Awarded Attorney Fees & Costs